After the fact, the American president announced the triumph of democracy and justice. He was not particularly shy, explaining to the world why Gaddafi was killed. His only statement about the resumption of American leadership in the world says enough to cool other "hot heads." So, in order.
"Democratic" position
NATO and the United States drew a picture quite acceptable for the start of the bombing for their voters. In their very one-sided opinion, in Libya, "democratic change has ripened." The people want a new political system in the country, and the dictator Gaddafi, of course, slows down these processes. His regime went with weapons against defenseless people. Only the killing of Gaddafi can make a difference. Everything seems to be clear. Only the result turned out to be completely different, not fitting into the drawn television “truth”. The death of Muammar Gaddafi is a long-held fact. Has it become easier for the people of Libya? Definitely not. Thousands of victims, destroyed cities, grief - this is the result of Obama's “peacekeeping”. In what was said to the voters, the truth was only hatred of Gaddafi: fierce, huge ... Why?
For what sins killed Gaddafi
In his death letter, the Libyan leader spoke about how he cared for his people, what are the goals of the reforms proposed (but not implemented) by him. Amid the bombings and victims, and even the cries of "democratic" media, this message was not given any significance. They began to understand later. As it turned out, the assassination of Gaddafi was predetermined by his too independent ideas. His sins before America consisted only in the fact that he wanted a decent life for his people. The wise leader was perfectly clear that his country was simply robbed, unscrupulously and unprincipled. He decided to change the situation in favor of the people of Libya. The forces playing the role of puppeteers did not endure the protest. The killing of Gaddafi was predetermined. About "sins" it needs to be told in more detail. Gaddafi's death is not just an indicator of America’s very strange interpretation of the principles of democracy. Rather, this is the moment when masks in world politics were removed. Each player demonstrated to the public overt cynicism, the true reasons for his "game."
The first sin is economic
Arguing why Gaddafi was killed, it is impossible to circumvent his ideas for developing his own country. Libya is mostly a desert, but rich in oil. So, the money is there. Consequently, it is an excellent market for corporate products. What the latter used, earning considerable profits. Gaddafi tried to change the situation by creating an irrigation system. Water from a huge natural underground reservoir was to green the desert, to become a source of developed agriculture. He did not engage foreigners in the project. They immediately calculated the losses from a decrease in their sales. Conclusion: is it any wonder why Gaddafi was killed? Nothing personal, as they say, just a business. Losses do not need corporations. They are not going to share the market with anyone. For the same reason, they do not need developed economies in other (backward) countries.
Second Sin - Raw
Libya is an indecently rich country. This, according to the West, should be tightly controlled. Money cannot belong to anyone, except for well-defined individuals who decide their destinies, so to speak. The leader of the country was at some point too intractable. He decided that only a third of oil revenues should remain with the country! Not completely, as it would be logical to assume, but only a part! But this was already enough for a "resistance" to arise in the country, striving to overthrow the "bloody regime"! It is already clear why Gaddafi was killed? He encroached on the holy of holies - corporate earnings. On the other hand, it was not necessary to start a war. You could just “squeeze” the field. It is unlikely that his army would have had the strength to fight the NATO units. And a wise leader would not resist, plunging the country into chaos. Why was it to arrange this massacre that destroyed the state? So, we come to the most interesting.
Sin Three - The Most Unforgivable
The dollar rules the world! This is a truth known to all. If you want - an axiom. Only the mechanisms of his "leadership" do not want to reveal too much. But the meaning is simple: the dollar rules as long as it is the world currency. And since the seventies of the last century, he was in a certain way tied to oil. Once you sell at least a couple of barrels for other signs, the dollar will begin to lose its “crown”. His dominance will be in jeopardy. This was perfectly understood by Muammar Gaddafi. For which they killed a too independent leader, it becomes clear that you only need to recall his idea of ​​creating a pan-African currency, in contrast to the dollar secured by gold. The idea, a very promising one in itself, jeopardized the well-being of those who live off the "loan interest." Now the answer to the question “why Gaddafi was killed” becomes clear and simple. He dared to encroach on the Western system of the world, on the distribution of cash flows. The emergence of a new currency pushed the ground out of the unsecured dollar. How long would he have lasted if another stable, stable money supply began to go around the world? Of course not. That's for these sins killed Gaddafi.
The monstrosity of "democracy"
It is clear that Gaddafi has turned into a "bloody dictator" because it jeopardized the income of Western corporations. Why didn’t they just “clean it up”? Why did you need to arrange a real massacre, kill thousands of innocent people? A normal person cannot understand the logic of “animals” fighting for their income. How could a normal country be practically wiped off the face of the earth ?! Plunge her into the horrors of civil war. It's no secret that Libya did not calm down even after the death of its leader. His sons and loyal supporters do not stop the fight against "democratic forces." The country is destroyed. Cities have turned into ruins, killing children and women, the population is suffering and starving. The economy has ceased to exist. Oil is produced by corporations, and Libya does not have any income left. The country only receives humanitarian aid, for which it is also supposed to pay. Is impoverishment of the people the goal of “democratic change”?
What Obama did not hide
The main "watchman" of democracy in the world has unambiguously deciphered what Gaddafi was killed for. To others it was not a bad idea to swing at the dollar! The world cannot change. The elite will not allow this. The order is defined for centuries. All roles are distributed. Loan interest, according to their concepts, should guide humanity until the end of its existence. Anyone who is against turns into the mortal enemy of the "democrats" from the United States. The lesson is presented. Leaders of other countries are invited to reflect: is it worth it to become patriots, or is it better to continue to "sell" their countries? Obama said very clearly: the United States proved to be the main country in the world. They will not tolerate resistance. Revenge will be cruel. Just death will not cost anyone. For dissent, countries will be erased from the face of the Earth, peoples will be destroyed. The Western version of the structure of the political and economic system does not recognize pity and compassion. The world must remain unipolar under any circumstances. Means and powers, and most importantly - human lives, no one will spare.
Lessons of Libya
The world has heard. The dollar was left alone for a while. Nobody wants to repeat the fate of Muammar Gaddafi . Although the latest events in Ukraine took place according to the Libyan scenario. Only bombing was avoided ... for now. The lessons learned from the Libyan events have benefited the international community. The instruction manual was learned and learned to respond correctly. Well, in the end, how much can you “breed” a population according to the same scenario? The world stood still. Who is the first to venture to take a step in the direction of the fall of the States? Obama was wrong. The desire to show what will happen to dissidents only demonstrated the weaknesses of the world elites to the renewed planet. It's time to use them. Only who dares?
The world is becoming multipolar ... A dream?
Bold found! China gradually began to abandon the dollar. So far, calculations in RMB are conducted only with Japan, but this is the first step! Quickly create a "stronghold of democracy" in this country with a huge population will not succeed. There is no suitable soil, too strong a domestic political regime. Beijing does not welcome revolutionaries on its territory. Yes, and the West is not ingratiatingly looking. Once. China works by creating most of the global product. Other countries began to declare the rejection of the dollar in the calculations. So, the UK ventured to implement some of Gaddafi’s ideas. They began to trade with Japan in national currencies. Do not have time "looking" to put things in order. It is too difficult to keep the world community in check when your weak spot is no longer a secret.
Russia's response to the killing of Gaddafi
Libya, Syria, Ukraine ... The “democratizer” began to act too transparently and blatantly. Feels that dominance is slipping from his clutches. Already in Syria, it became clear that the world community no longer agreed to endure lies and violence. Tales of the bloody regimes no one else takes on faith. And terrorism, artificially created and supported with the goal of intimidating the public, no longer affects minds. The underlying goals and methods for achieving them have also become apparent. The effect of the killing of Gaddafi turned out to be exactly the opposite of the alleged. This was especially evident in the events in Ukraine. “We don’t leave our own” - this is Russia's response to the “democratic” coup in the neighboring state. The world will never be unipolar again. Bloody terror must sink into oblivion. It is necessary - a "nuclear shield" will be used. It is time to stop the “beholder”, who drowns countries in the blood for profit. All peoples have the right to their own view of things. We are different. And this is the beauty of the world. The life of Muammar Gaddafi has shown that patriotism and love for the homeland have a right to exist. His death is the path that nations need to follow for harmonious development.