Now on the electronics market there is such a huge variety of solutions that some users have difficulty choosing a device for some parameters. And here the question may well arise, which is better: IPS or TFT, and what are the differences in these technologies. In the catalogs of technology, namely in the descriptions of displays, you can find a lot of incomprehensible information that prompts the search for answers.
Technology Features
So, to determine which is better: IPS or TFT, you need to know how both matrices work, that is, what principles are laid in their foundation. The first is essentially a more perfect version of the second, that is, a slightly different approach was used in its creation.
TFT is such a method of manufacturing a matrix of liquid crystal screens, in which it is assumed that the crystals are arranged in a spiral between a pair of plates. If voltage is not applied, then they rotate in a horizontal plane to each other at right angles. At maximum voltage, they are rotated so that the light passing through them forms a black color of the pixels, and when there is no voltage - white. If we talk about which is better: IPS or TFT, then the first technology differs from the second in that the crystals in such a matrix are not arranged spirally, but parallel to the plane of the screen and with respect to each other. When voltage is not applied, the crystals do not rotate, which is how this matrix differs from the previous one.
Difference from the point of view of the user
So, considering the question of which is better: IPS or TFT, it is worth saying that visually the difference here is in greater contrast, which ensures almost perfect black color transmission. Thanks to this, the image is very clear. When using the TFT matrix, we can talk about low color rendering quality. In this case, each pixel has its own hue, which does not coincide with the rest. Colors can be very distorted due to this. But such a solution has considerable dignity, namely a high response speed in comparison with all existing at the moment. IPS-screen requires a certain time for a complete turn of parallel crystals. The human eye almost does not catch the difference in response time.
Important points
Understanding what is better: IPS or TFT-display, it is worth noting that the first option is more energy intensive. This is associated with the need for more energy to rotate crystals. When it comes to the need to ensure maximum energy efficiency, the manufacturer makes his choice in favor of TFT-matrices. However, IPS technology is characterized by very wide viewing angles, which are up to 178 degrees. This provides maximum ease of use. All other matrices cannot provide such a review. Currently, TFT is the simplest and cheapest solution used in most models of devices of the budget segment. At the same time, it is customary to classify IPS at a higher level, but it is impossible to name it top-notch, since at the moment there are more advanced developments.
TFT PLS or IPS: which is better?
The first type of matrix is characterized by a short response time and optimal energy intensity, but the color rendering level in this case is slightly behind the rest of the technologies. IPS-matrix provides excellent color reproduction, optimal contrast, large viewing angles, but at the same time it is also characterized by high energy costs required for work.
Between screens working on these two technologies, there is simply a huge gap in terms of quality. The same applies to cost. TFT matrices remain on the market just because they are so cheap.