Knowledge has always determined human behavior. But this knowledge did not always reflect objective reality. It is strange that examples of the construction of power plants and the erection of dams by beavers, pursuing the equivalent methods of achieving the result, are far from always equally effective in realizing the goal.
People have repeatedly resorted to the use of wildlife to restore a particular environmental situation, to revive the population of endangered species or for other reasons, but to a lesser extent received the desired result than designing machines and mechanisms.
Labor, life and technological safety
Labor protection is not a “worker at an enterprise” who asks to sign an instruction. Few people read labor protection instructions. Few people care about life in general. Wildly sounds the proposal to have your own fire extinguisher in a private house, and even more so an apartment. The field of labor protection has confidently developed in public consciousness as a combination of naturally known, and therefore obviously unnecessary knowledge
Only in trouble, when another accident occurs, does a person realize how deep his delusions were and how everything could have been foreseen in advance, and the city authorities are competent in the search for the guilty and severely punish them.
Violations of norms and objective reality
History knows cases when project managers did not inspect something, but took something into account. For example, laying a railway near a settlement. They did not inspect, there were obvious violations of the established norms, but they accepted the object, although they found:
- the wrong degree of slope of the canvas;
- not the distance between the rails;
- residential buildings within the danger zone.
But the real accident came from the fact that the vibration caused a resonance and all the bolts from the web mounts jumped out. The train crashed, but did not cover everything that was built nearby in violation of other standards, from a completely different area of security.
The architect made a mistake and built residential buildings in the danger zone, but he took into account the features of the slope of the surface in the territory where the railway passed.
Indeed, it is difficult to foresee everything - it is difficult to argue with this. But in the history of the development of safety equipment, ecology, fire, sanitary and now technogenic areas, knowledge and experience have already been accumulated.
Professional retraining: “Labor protection, technosphere safety: theory and practice” has become not only in demand, but also prestigious. The heads of state institutions, directors of large companies no longer represent normal development without taking into account human and technological factors in the aggregate.
Retraining Programs
The technosphere safety professional retraining program, in fact, does not change the work of a specialist, but significantly expands and improves it. This is a great experience and excellent knowledge that a specialist will apply in the field in which he works. This is a well-known effect of the use of TRIZ (theory of solving inventive problems), the movement and application of quality ideas in various industries.
Known patterns and laws, "discovered" in one area, move to another area and provide its greater security. A specialist can foresee the occurrence of a hazard, calculate the probability of its occurrence, time, place and offer the best solution.
Typically, a vocational retraining program and technosphere safety include:
- methods and logic of observations;
- principles and methods of process analysis;
- methods and mathematical apparatus of risk management;
- principles of organization and process management;
- other directions.
Successful completion of training allows a specialist to reassess his work, draw up a plan and implement promising ideas in his own sphere of competence. Often this is enough to avoid probable problems, to increase efficiency and labor productivity.
Reviews: retraining but not training
It is professional retraining and technosphere safety, and not training in the subject as such. The main thesis in reviews of retraining programs in the technosphere and safety engineering is a real subject, technosphere safety is additional important knowledge.
Judging by the reviews of qualified specialists, before learning to analyze technospheric situations and ensure the safety of life, life and production, a specialist should have basic knowledge. In addition to basic knowledge, you need your own experience and practice. Otherwise, full-time, distance learning, and distance learning of the technosphere security of the company or territory will remain in the same risk zone.
The ideas of retraining, continuing education courses, conferences, business trips to enterprises, to other regions and countries are a long and effective tradition for the exchange of experience and knowledge. The technogenic sphere is a dynamically growing spectrum of knowledge, the reason to study constantly, the exchange of opinions and feedback on specific applications of knowledge is an important component of the development of the technosphere as a whole.
The dynamics of IT technologies, the development of the Internet and the professional retraining of technosphere security, as a remotely dynamic option, allows combining the efforts of specialists in solving technogenic problems.
The level of development of the territory and production
The region is different for the region , and companies differ not only in their attitude to the industry. A metallurgical enterprise with a long tradition may be less dangerous for its employees than a new server room for a large data center.
Accidents in the metallurgical industry are common practice, but it always has steady dynamics in reducing the number of such cases. The labor safety specialist here is responsible for controlling employees over his head, here he not only reads labor safety instructions, but before signing, they pass the exam more than once.
A modern data center is, first of all, a race for privileges, these are the mottos of cloud technologies and mythical novels about a new level of user security. Where to assess the likelihood of a technosphere accident. All equipment is modern, fire extinguishers are in place, indoor ecology is on par.
Facts are a stubborn thing, and as a result of one or two cases of flooding in Moscow data centers, it is enough that technosphere safety and professional retraining in Moscow will differ sharply from similar work in the Moscow region.
Information Technology: Peaceful Movement Towards Disaster?
Any computer, especially a smartphone or laptop, is low currents, no danger, environmentally friendly use. But professional retraining and technosphere danger is an obvious reality here, the understanding of which advanced IT consciousness has not yet come to.
Programming is peaceful work, but professional programming is work on the verge of collapse. If you do not take into account the purely psychological and physical aspects of the endurance of labor of professional developers, then the comfort of the workplace determines the "service life" of the specialist and the duration of subsequent treatment.
The cost of a qualified programmer is very high, the responsibility of the results of his work is proportional to his salary.
The error is much more expensive. As a result, errors can unexpectedly meet not only two trains on the same railway track, but also tons of fuel will not lift the spacecraft into orbit, but will fall out in the form of precipitation, indicating the path to this orbit.
How many IT companies have labor protection specialists in their staff who have passed or have an idea of what professional retraining, technosphere safety and software code quality assessment are?
Quality of behavior and evaluation of the algorithm
There are always only two situations.
The first - everything is already there, and the care of a specialist who has completed the courses "Vocational Training: Technosphere Security" is to maintain his "economy" within acceptable standards, continuously monitor and analyze the situation, providing for all possible negative development directions.
Another area is more complex. It is necessary to design a new production, to provide what can happen during the creation and subsequent operation. The experience of creating such enterprises has always been a good help, but when creating everything new, usually there is new knowledge, mechanisms and machines.
The issue of the quality of behavior is the result of the application of knowledge, its quality and an objective attitude to reality. Not only the algorithm for applying quality knowledge is important, but also the continuous evaluation of any process, event, phenomenon.
The more factors in the observation area, the more prospects ... and no man-made disasters.