Being a student is not easy. Probably all people know this. A lot of tests, exams, various individual works: course, design, graphic ... However, the most important and necessary work of a student is a thesis. In this article I want to talk about such a detail of the thesis as a review: when, how and by whom it should be compiled.
Key Documents
When the most important scientific work of a student has already been written, it should be supported by a specific set of documents. Among them, there must be two important elements:
- review;
- feedback on the thesis.
So how do they differ? If we talk about the structure, then the review and review will be almost the same (there are small nuances, of course, but the essence will be approximately the same). What is the difference? In who should draw up these documents. If the review is written by the supervisor, that is, the employee of the department who helped the student all the way to writing scientific work, then the review is written by an independent specialist who knows the subject studied by the student. Everything else will be very similar: the structure and points that will be given attention in these documents. The essence of these documents is one and the same: to reveal how much the student coped with the topic. If the student was required to recall the organization for the thesis, then it’s still worth clarifying: maybe it was meant that you need a review from the organization, and not a review? This is possible if the document is compiled in the place where the student goes through pre-diploma practice and practiced his empirical section in practice. Once again, I want to remind you: the review should be written by the student’s supervisor who helped him all the way to writing his thesis. The head of the company can write a review.
About Standards
So, how to write a review on the thesis? The sample is an excellent assistant in this matter. But where to find him? So, it is worth saying that there is no single template, GOST. It is best to take an example of writing this document at the department where the student will defend. This is the only way to avoid basic mistakes in its preparation (after all, a department can put forward certain requirements for drawing up a review, which will be relevant only for this educational unit).
The main thing
How are the reviews for the thesis prepared? An example of his writing can be found out from the department employees (most likely from the methodologist), who should provide all the information of interest. Although, by and large, a review is a document that is drawn up in any form. However, it is necessary to take into account several particularly important nuances:
- the size of the review may vary in the amount of 1-2 pages A4;
- at its core, it is an assessment of the student's work indicating both positive and negative aspects of the work;
- the review should contain some formal points: the so-called “cap” indicating the student’s full name, the topic of his thesis, etc., everything should be sealed and signed below.
Decor
It is also important to say how the review on the student’s thesis should be drawn up correctly. So, the main thing today is the requirement: this document must be printed, hand-written is not accepted. You also need to maintain the volume (as already mentioned, at least 1 page and no more than two). When preparing a document, you can use bold font to indicate important nuances that you want to pay attention to, some points can be highlighted in italics. No more special text selections are recommended. Must be signed by the supervisor. There should also be a wet seal.
About the content
This document should contain the following information:
- The text of the review must necessarily include a brief conclusion about the work of the student as a whole (as far as it meets the requirements).
- Evaluation of the relevance of the selected topic (how much it is in tune with the requirements of the present).
- Separately, a mark should be set for the section responsible for the empirical part of the work.
- The very text of the review should end with a brief and concise conclusion by the supervisor about the work done by the student.
Generally speaking, writing a review on a thesis should consist of a brief assessment of the work that a student has done while studying his topic. In this case, the supervisor must pay attention to all its parts.
Official moments
How to get feedback on the thesis? An example of such a document is presented in the photo below, but it itself must contain the following important points:
- Name of the author, i.e. student.
- The topic of the diploma over which the student worked.
At the very end of the document, the signature of the person who made the review (supervisor) should be put . His academic degree should also be indicated. Everything is sealed with the seal of either the department or the faculty. Only if all these conditions are met, the reviewer's review of the thesis is considered an official document.
Sample
So, what do you need to make a review on the thesis? Sample is a great helper. As mentioned above, in principle, its shape can be any. However, it is better to stick to certain points. So, approximately the review can look as follows.
The official part:
- Name of student.
- Title of thesis
Main text:
- brief information about what is the structure of the thesis (of how many parts it consists of, how much the structure meets the requirements);
- a few words about the introduction - the most important part of the thesis, where the subject, object, purpose of writing a scientific work must be formulated, the relevance of the issue in question is revealed, etc.
- brief information on what is the subject of the first and second chapters;
- the supervisor should pay particular attention to the characterization of the empirical section, where the study conducted by the student on the topic under study should be described;
- the following are general conclusions about scientific work;
- a separate paragraph should highlight the strengths of the student’s thesis, which he was particularly good at;
- it is also necessary to pay attention to the weaknesses of the work on which the student has not worked enough;
- the supervisor should also indicate whether various sources regarding the topic have been used sufficiently;
- at the very end, the leader makes the main conclusion: how much the work meets the requirements, whether it can be admitted to the defense, what grade it deserves at the time of writing.
Special nuances
What else can reflect reviews on the thesis? An example is the optional nuances listed below that make this document more lively and personalized. So, the supervisor can evaluate the student's independence during the study of the selected topics. Here you can indicate the consistency of the presentation of the material, its competent processing and presentation. The general literacy of the student can also be assessed: how much the work is done in a scientific style, how accurate and competent the presentation of the material is. At the same time, the teacher can express several wishes to the student in this document; you can give recommendations if you wish.
Now you know how to write reviews on the thesis. An example of the design was considered in detail in the article, the materials of which, in case of difficulty, can always be consulted.