How to write a review, review of a scientific article, diploma, dissertation, textbook? This question is asked at least once, probably by all those involved in education. After all, even a university student sometimes has to do this work himself. At first glance, writing a review or review seems to be an incomprehensible and difficult task. In fact, in order for a review or review of a diploma to be carried out at a high level, you need to know certain requirements and follow a clear structure for the presentation of scientific thought. We will consider these subtleties below.
The first thing that the author needs to remember: a diploma review or a review of a scientific article is not a detailed retelling and not your personal sympathy or antipathy to the topic and presentation. First of all, these are logically grounded opinions of a person who is an expert in a specific field.
When wondering how to write a review, it is worth first of all to clearly understand the meaning of this word. Review is a special text - an analysis of a specific source, designed for a certain circle of readers. The main purpose of this message is to inform and evaluate the level of the analyzed source. Showing the general idea of the peer-reviewed text, the author should highlight the positive points and present reasonable criticisms.
What particular aspects, key moments will appear on the court of a specialist - this is his individual vision. There is no one right way. It all depends on the competence and scientific interests of the reviewer.
The technology of reviewing can be divided into the following stages:
- determine the subject of the peer-reviewed material;
- find out what is the degree of relevance of the proposed scientific research;
- analyze the architectonics and semantic content of the text;
- Be sure to pay attention to such an important point as the analysis of scientific novelty, clearly express your opinion regarding the originality of the work;
- note how theoretical concepts are combined and how much they correspond to the results of empirical calculations, thereby logically substantiate the level of practical significance;
- list the strengths and weaknesses of the work (the reviewer must indicate exactly what the author managed to cope with the task, and what else may require additional study, note ambiguous interpretations of scientific results, any discussion points);
- very briefly and objectively formulate an opinion about the work and give a general assessment;
- formulate conclusions, here you can add information about the author or describe who the work is addressed to and may be interesting.
Performing these actions sequentially and observing the structure of the review will serve for its high-quality writing, as well as this algorithm of actions can be safely used in preparing comments on a scientific work of any genre.
Before writing a review, you must also familiarize yourself with the basic stylistic features of the presentation of scientific thought. The text itself should be clear and precise, easy to understand and not contain lexical turns inherent in art or colloquial speech.
If the reviewer wants to reinforce his impression with any comparative characteristics, epithets, phraseological units, etc., then this is categorically inappropriate, since writing a review is necessary only in a scientific style. Even the brightest positive or, on the contrary, sharply negative impression of the work must be tried to convey without using the expressive means of the literary word.