From time to time, you may come across videos or articles under the heading "What you canât google." Moreover, if for the sake of curiosity you look at the description, you will see words that are absolutely harmless at first glance. Why such inquiries can shock even the most calm people? And what will you see if you drive âforbiddenâ words into the search bar?
It is worth warning - these pictures are really not for the faint of heart. And even more so they should not be shown to pregnant women, young children and those who are especially suggestible.
Fournier. Attention, you can not google: tin!
The French football player, who also managed to stay as an Olympic coach, also got into the most terrible Google queries. Seriously, Hubert Fournier has nothing to do with shock content.
He was just âlucky" to be the namesake of an outstanding French doctor. That, in turn, back in 1883 described a terrible disease, cases of which are still often found. We are talking about the gangrene of the scrotum, which is rapidly spreading in the body. The consequences, like the course of the disease itself, are simply terrible. As you know, all this also looks, to put it mildly, not very aesthetically pleasing.
Either diseases are more interesting for people than football successes, or Google just likes to shock its users, but at the request of âFurnierâ you will not see frames with Hubert at all.
âPearlescentâ - is it about buttons?
What can be so special in the word âpearlescentâ that you canât google it even because of a very strong sense of curiosity? Many may even come up with memories of âthe exact same robe, but with mother-of-pearl buttonsâ.
Unfortunately, the cult film âThe Diamond Armâ has nothing to do with it. And again, the matter is in the disease. Pearly papules are no longer such a dangerous medical case as the gangrene described above. They are not even considered an STD, but rather an aesthetic flaw. But he looks more than creepy!
Why is Google giving out ugly frames in the first place, and not an illustration for the shade or some things? Perhaps the point is a rather peculiar sense of humor. Or maybe the fact that the joke about the dangerous request âmother-of-pearlâ was long exaggerated on the Internet some time ago.
Flap: Googleâs horrors under a harmless request
One more word that it is impossible to google even under reliable pretexts is a "flap". Yes, it sounds harmless and inspires thoughts about cutting and sewing. Nevertheless, the Google joker invites us to look at the details of skin grafting on different parts of the body, the process of âgrowingâ donor tissue and, as a âfinal chord,â genitals that are completely devoid of skin.
Why is it not worth googling "peaked"?
The word "spiky" is another adjective that you can not google. It would seem that such a characteristic can go anywhere: children's pyramids, architectural structures, appliances. However, the Google leadership, according to the tradition already familiar to us, considers the request as part of another medical term.
Spiky papillomas are not the worst thing in this world. But itâs better not to check, âcloggingâ the word on Google. As you can see, the bulk of the âscaryâ requests are various diseases, deviations. Which once again proves that one should not be negligent in one's health.
Pimples
Finally, let's return to the medical topic. You donât understand what relation the word âpimplesâ can have to it? Of course, among the official terms of doctors there is no such designation. However, restless patients often prefer to share their strange rashes with the whole world, posting photos on websites, forums, in online diaries and calling the symptoms completely non-professional terms.
The Google search engine âjoyfullyâ indexes all these images and offers them in the top results. So you should not request pictures for the word "pimples" if you are not interested in such detailed details of other people's diseases.
"Tin" - what lies behind a simple request?
You can evaluate Google horror stories even with such a simple query as tin. It seems like this word indicates that the user is looking for absolutely any frame with an image of a sheet of steel. But for the search engine, this is a signal that you can show all the most terrible and disgusting. Generalized queries are not at all worth experimenting with if you are not inclined to enjoy illustrations for diseases, dissected bodies and similar abominations.
Some people enjoy watching these pictures, but itâs worth admitting thatâs not normal. For an ordinary person, illustrations for the word âtinâ will only cause a spoiled mood or a feeling of oppression.
"Cluster" - a request that should not be entered
You do not know what the words âcluster holesâ and âtripophobiaâ mean? Never google it! Both terms intersect. More precisely, the latter denotes a phobia in front of just the same cluster holes, their mass clusters. They look especially disgusting on human skin. "Holes" on plants scare, probably, only the owners of such a strange phobia.
The name strange strange deviation was given only 12 years ago, and modern science still has not officially recognized it. However, few people are absolutely indifferent to looking at round holes that resemble either a symptom of a disease or parasites. In normal life, cluster holes are found as bubbles in dough or in lotus seeds.
For the sake of curiosity, of course, you can enter this query. But suddenly you become one of the owners of tripophobia?
As practice shows, the call "Never google it!" Only provokes and inflames curiosity. Well, itâs your business, but we have warned! Then, finally, itâs worth clarifying: all the âfrighteningâ requests will be revealed âin all its gloryâ only in the âimagesâ tab. And be sure to remove the children from the screen!