Society is a form of organization of individuals united by common values and institutions. Each member of society is a living person who has his desires and needs, his social roles. For each person, the values shared by the public majority are relevant to one degree or another, and this relevance depends on many different factors: external and internal, economic and ideological, personal life success, psychological state of the individual.
You cannot find two absolutely identical
people, a person as a member of society - an individual set of values, needs and desires formed in the
process of socialization . Society must immanently identify the common desires and ideals of people and create conditions for their implementation.
So, the vast majority of citizens without mental deviations are aware of the value of human life, constructive forms of relationships between people, security, at least the minimum amount of material wealth. That is why institutions such as the army, police, family and marriage institutions are the most stable in society.
But things are much more complicated with the political predilections of the people. The activities of the authorities and the political regime always suit the part of society that is provided with material, social benefits and other privileges. Those members of the society whom the existing regime does not suit for some reason often become adherents of radical views.
Political radicalism is a theoretical category denoting a radical reformist attitude of a certain part of society, strong dissatisfaction with existing orders and the desire to destroy them, not always supported by a clearly formulated viable (not utopian) concept of a new order.
There is no ideal society capable of satisfying the needs of each of its members, therefore political radicalism is not rarely an inconvenience, but a constant political reality.
Political radicalism becomes a significant factor only when reformist sentiments capture large social groups, when whole layers and layers of society are unsatisfied with the existing order. The relevance of the existing regime for a particular society, thus, is determined by the scale of the spread of radical moods in it.
In recent years, radicalism in Russia has been exacerbated by certain acts of the activity of central authorities. An example of significant public discontent for society and the state was the Russian March on November 4, 2012, when hundreds of Russian people took to the streets and even law enforcement agencies could not prevent their protest against the well-known policies of the central government and the publicized repeated acts of unlawful activity of citizens of some other nationalities.
Political radicalism, of course, is a danger to the existing system, testifies to its obsolescence and inadequacy to the actual needs of society. But at the same time, political radicalism is a guideline for the development of society. If you listen to radical citizens, you can find out about the most important tasks that cannot be solved by existing methods, the solution of which involves appropriate reforms.