In a state of law, each person should be independent not only of the people around him, but also of the highest authorities. Personal freedom is ensured by the current Constitution, as well as by the norms of other legislative acts.
Of course, we are largely dependent on each other and on the state in which we live, however, no one can tell us what to do and how to act in certain situations. Our choice is our choice. Nobody should do it for us.
Human freedom is what you need to cherish and protect, despite what is happening around. Why? Yes, because it is the basis of well-being. Freedom of personality is undeniable. We ourselves choose what to strive for, what to do, what books to read, and so on. Today it is forbidden even to impose religious views on people.
Freedom is a product of social development. It is, in principle, impossible to measure it, but it is still possible to say whether it is there. It is not only external, but also internal. The latter does not depend on laws and on how they are followed, but on how a person relates to life, how he feels reality.
Personal freedom is not only imaginary, but also real immunity. As mentioned above, it is simply impossible to measure it. It may seem to a person for a long time that he lives completely independently, but in one fine moment he will notice that he is infringed by the state or other people. What difference does it make in laws if nobody fulfills their norms?
In general, modern man is untouchable. The ability to go to court every time one or another of our rights has been violated is actually worth a lot. We have the right to use our property at our sole discretion, to practice the religion that we like (we may not profess at all), we can use all that is rightfully our right. What is important here? First of all, that we, exercising our rights and freedoms, do not infringe on the rights and freedoms of other people. The great thinker said that the freedom of one person ends in the very place where the freedom of another begins.
Yes, laws should limit us in many ways, because without the existing prohibitions for which sanctions are provided, people would infringe on each other's rights and interests as much as they can. Without prohibitions, everything around would quickly turn into chaos. Laws must be fair and well thought out. They should be created to ensure favorable conditions for all people, and not some specific layers or groups. The goals that underlie them must be humane.
Personal freedom allows a person to live exactly the way he wants. Each person independently decides whether to strive for heights or simply exist calmly, without claiming to be something great, significant, big. It is impossible to impose one’s opinion, and is it worth doing at all? Let everyone choose how to live. Yes, it’s not worth interfering in other people's affairs.
Personal freedom in a state of law has a direct connection with the possibility of expressing one’s own opinion. Can you say what you think is right? Everything is complicated here. People who tried to oppose the current government probably felt for themselves that freedom of speech in our country is not so narrow and respected: it exists, and it does not exist at the same time. They like to shut our mouths, withhold information from us, and promote what we consider necessary. People in power in our country do not so often think about what personal freedom is. Will it ever be fixed, changed, destroyed? Unknown There are too many imaginary freedoms that modern people, unfortunately, perceive as significant.