What proportion of free time do people devote to self-education? Hundredth, thousandth? The human mind is stale over the years, becoming less susceptible to new knowledge. Why is this happening, where does past activity disappear? Internal luggage is something that we replenish throughout our lives, we “lay out” something from the chest with knowledge and take it with us, and something remains there “until better times”, sits, is forgotten. But why do people always put off a trip to a museum, gallery, theater? Art. Has it really lost its influence? In the 18-19 centuries in a noble society it was fashionable to speak French. Many say that this is one of the most stupid trends. Wait a moment. But it’s wonderful to be on the same wavelength as those who strive for personal development. Is not it so? So, consider the problems of art in the arguments confirming their presence.
What is real art?
What is art? Is it canvas, majestically flaunting in the gallery or the immortal "Seasons" by Antonio Vivaldi? For some, art is a bouquet of wildflowers assembled with love, it is a modest master who donates his masterpiece not to auction, but to the one whose heartbeat aroused genius, which allowed the feeling to become the source of something eternal. People believe that everything spiritual is subject to knowledge, they read a myriad of books that can make them experts in a special society, in a society where the depth of Malevich’s square is not understood - this is a real crime, a sign of ignorance.
Recall the famous story of Mozart and Salieri. Salieri, "... he destroyed the music like a corpse," but the guiding light illuminated the path of Mozart. Art is subject only to the heart, living a dream, love, hope. Fall in love, then you will undoubtedly become a part of art called love. The problem is sincerity. The arguments below are evidence of this.
What is the crisis of art? The problem of art. Arguments
It seems to some that art today is no longer what it was during the time of Buonarroti, Leonardo da Vinci. What changed? Time. And the people are the same. And in the Renaissance, the creators were not always understood, not even because the population did not have a high level of literacy, but because the womb of life eagerly absorbs feelings, young freshness and good beginnings. What about literature? Pushkin. Was his talent worthy only of intrigue, slander and 37 years of life? The problem with art is that it is not appreciated until the creator, who acts as the embodiment of the gift of heaven, stops breathing. We let fate decide on art. Well, that’s what we have. The names of the composers are alien to the ears, books are gathering dust on the shelves. By this fact, the problem of art in the arguments from the literature is most clearly represented.
"How difficult it is now to be happy,
Laugh loudly, out of place;
Do not succumb to false feelings
And living without a plan is at random.
To be with the one whose cry for miles is heard
Enemies try to circumvent;
Do not repeat that I’m offended by life,
A worthy heart wide open. "
Literature is the only art form that speaks of problems in such a way that you immediately want to fix it
The problem of art, arguments from literature ... Why do authors so often raise it in their works? Only creative nature can trace the path of the spiritual fall of mankind. Let us take as an argument the famous Hugo novel "Notre Dame de Paris". The story is generated by one word 'ANA'GKN (c Greek "rock"). It not only symbolizes the doom of the fate of the heroes, but also the cyclical destruction of the inviolable: “This is what has been done with the wonderful churches of the Middle Ages for two hundred years now ... The priest repaints them, the architect scrapes them; then the people come and destroy them. ” In the same work, a young playwright Pierre Gringoire appears before us. What a low drop was prepared for him at the very beginning of the journey! Lack of recognition, vagrancy. And death seemed to him a way out, but in the end he was one of the few who were waiting for a happy ending. He thought a lot, dreamed a lot. Mental tragedy led to public triumph. His goal is recognition. She turned out to be more realistic than the desire of Claude Frollo and Quasimodo to be with Esmeralda, than Esmeralda’s dream of becoming the only one for Phoebe.
Is packaging important in art?
Probably everyone had to hear the combination of "form of art." What is the idea of its meaning? The issue of art is itself ambiguous and requires a special approach. Form is a kind of state in which an object resides, its material manifestation in the environment. Art - how do we feel it? Art is music and literature, it is architecture and painting. This is what we perceive on a particular spiritual level. Music - the sound of keys, strings; literature is a book whose smell is comparable only with the aroma of freshly baked bread; architecture - the rough surface of the walls, the centuries-old spirit of the time; painting is wrinkles, folds, veins, all the beautiful imperfect features of the living. All these are art forms. Some of them are visual (material), while others are perceived in a special way, and in order to feel them, it is not at all necessary to touch. Being sensitive is a talent. And then it will become completely irrelevant in what frame of Mona Lisa and from what device Beethoven's Moonlight Sonata sounds. The problem of art form and arguments are complex and need attention.
The problem of the influence of art on man. Arguments
I wonder what is the essence of the problem? Art ... It would seem, what influence, apart from the positive, is it capable of exerting ?! And if the problem is that it has irretrievably lost control of the human mind and is no longer able to make a strong impression?
Consider all sorts of options. As for the negative impact, we recall such canvases as “Scream”, “Portrait of Maria Lopukhina” and many others. It is not known for what reason such mystical stories have entrenched in them, but it is believed that they can have a negative effect on people who have looked at the canvases. The injuries caused to people who offended the picture of E. Munch, crippled the fate of infertile girls who looked at the unfortunate beauty with a tragic story depicted by Borovikovsky shortly before her death. What is much worse is that art is now soulless. It cannot even arouse negative emotion. We are amazed, admire, but after a minute, or even earlier, we forget what we saw. Indifference and the absence of any interest is real misfortune. We humans are made for something great. Everyone, without exception. The choice is only ours: to be the same or not. The problem of art and the arguments are now understood, and from now on everyone will promise to live their hearts.