Almost every person in his life enters into any kind of production relationship, in particular at work, because this implies the interaction of people in the production, consumption, distribution and, of course, the exchange of material goods. In the aggregate, productive forces and production relations are a historical mode of production .
This interaction forms a foundation on which the activities of enterprises have been based for many years. However, production relations have always entered into a polemic with forces. At first, man stimulated the development of engineering and technology, which significantly increased the power of productive forces and led to a decrease in the need for relationships. This cycle is periodically repeated in modern activities. That is, people periodically become hostages of their own initiative.
Under the communist system, experts nevertheless confirmed the need for a balance between these elements. Finally, they recognized that relations are also important for improving the well-being of the population and the successful functioning of enterprises, as well as strength. Even at the time of the development of Marxist teachings, the dialectics of productive forces and production relations were revealed. A law was published which stated that the nature of relations always corresponds to the degree of development of forces in the production process. Thus, in each historical period, a special method of manufacturing material goods was used, which was characterized by specific relationships that fully corresponded to a given time. This was the only way to achieve unity and coherence in the system of production of goods and services.
One of the most important elements of this system is the ownership of the means of production, since they are the main link in the chain of communication between manufacturers and fixed assets. This helps to achieve the main goal of any enterprise and explains the existence of other types of relationships. Socialist property presupposed state ownership of all property involved in production activities, which prevented the social stratification of society. Indeed, under such a system there were no private owners, which means that there was no enslavement of one person by another. All were equal before the authorities.
As mentioned above, production relations include the process of distribution and exchange of labor products. This movement cannot occur without human interaction. At the stage of production of finished products, relations arise between the company and suppliers of raw materials, the head and subordinates, between representatives of different departments of the same company. At the stage of distribution and marketing of goods or services, relations are observed with counterparties who are direct buyers of material goods, as a rule, with a view to their further resale.
Industrial relations have characteristic features. For example, they are formed regardless of the will and desire of a person, and people interact because they have certain skills and knowledge that are in demand in this industry. The degree of development of production forces has a direct effect. It is this factor that is considered decisive in choosing a particular type of relationship.
In conclusion, we can conclude that industrial relations are a form of human interaction in the process of manufacturing material goods. Without these relations, it is impossible to develop a single industry, and therefore, they play a crucial role in the economic life of the country.