The watch has long passed from the category of time tracking tools to the status of a multifunctional gadget. Modern technologies make it possible to supply them with a mass of sensors, indicators and even measuring devices. On the one hand, this complicates the design, making it more massive and demanding in maintenance, but on the other hand, for many users, the device becomes an effective assistant in work and at leisure. Perhaps one of the most popular trends in the development of watches is sports. And not professional, but on an amateur level - the Polar M400 watch belongs to the category of sports models, a review of which will allow to evaluate their advantages and disadvantages.
Model Overview
The model is a type of GPS watch, but its functionality goes far beyond this purpose. Connoisseurs of the segment share the device’s functions in two directions - using activity as a tracker and sports watches in their modern presentation. The presence of Bluetooth allows the gadget to effectively manage sensors, which is a good functional base for those involved in athletics, cycling, skiing and other sports that involve several muscle groups in the process of effective training. As for the control and monitoring of individual activity, the Polar M400 model will also offer a lot of useful things. The activity sensor will allow you to track the most important parameters of life, as well as select the optimal biorhythms for sleep and recovery. We can say that almost all modern watches with the prefix “smart” have similar capabilities, but the developers of Polar focused on ergonomics and simplicity, which many representatives of this niche lack.
Specifications
Despite the simplification against the background of more advanced models of the manufacturer, this option does not seem very poor in terms of its capabilities. Suffice it to mention Bluetooth technology and a GPS receiver, which the Polar M400 gadget has. A review of the technical parameters presented below will help to form a more complete opinion about the device:
- Case thickness - 11.5 mm.
- Mass - 57 g.
- The screen is monochrome with a resolution of 128 x 128.
- Number of languages - 15.
- Memory capabilities - about 30 hours in training mode with GPS function.
- Battery capabilities - 8 hours in training mode and 24 days when using the device as a tracker.
- Data transfer - using a USB cable, you can transfer information to a computer.
- Water tightness - use at a depth of 30 m is possible.
According to the characteristics, the model really does not look premium, however, this has its advantages. Again, the device is a simplified version of the flagships in the manufacturer's line. At the same time, the Polar M400 watch retained a good performance of the technical filling, which, by the way, is enclosed in an attractive shell.
Model design
Almost all the “smart” watches of the latest generation not only differ in technologically advanced functions, but also stand out for their design. In particular, the creators of TomTom do their best to experiment with contrasts. For example, one of the latest devices is available in red and blue. Against this background, Polar decided to bet on conservatism by releasing a model in white and black. Particularly pleasing to the eye is a snow-white case and a light-colored strap. No less attractive is the black Polar M400 HR version. Reviews note that it looks less catchy, but stylish. The case is decorated with a black frame bordering in the form of a red thin line.
The right part has three buttons that are used to control the device. On the left side are the main keys for controlling the menu, as well as a button for adjusting the backlight. Unfortunately, the developers of the model could not overcome the main drawback of such watches - a compact and convenient button layout. Using them is inconvenient, and you almost have to aim with each press. One way or another, the appearance of the watch was a success. Both the white version and the Polar M400 Black look decent. And now it’s worth getting acquainted with the interface and ergonomics.
Interface
The main function of the watch in the form of a time demonstration is activated on the screen when the gadget is not used for training. The rest of the time, the display shows indicators of current activity. In particular, it can be the level of activity as a percentage with a diary, settings, various timers and a fitness test. To activate the fitness test option and determine the level of physical fitness, you need to start the Polar M400 heart rate monitor and set the timer. There can be two modes - interval and with an estimate of the finish time. Accordingly, if you plan to set a personal record, you should activate the second mode.
To switch to the activity monitoring mode, you need to click on the central button on the right side - that is, from the screen that displays the date and time. Then it remains to choose one of the tracking formats - for example, “Running” or “Cycling”. There are other modes of operation of the tracker function in the Polar M400 - instructions in Russian will help to understand their settings and notation. By the way, the device is also able to track the level of activity of swimmers and skiers.
Performance
You should start with the quality of catching the signal. This is a weak point of the gadget, because the GPS-receiver has been detecting it for a long time. But the problem is not only that. Even when tuning takes place, it is necessary to remain motionless so that the signal is “fixed”. But otherwise the performance of the device is only pleasing. For example, in the process of running and increased activity, information about movements is read quickly and clearly. Switching between the screens of the Polar M400 occurs seamlessly and without delay, so you won’t be distracted by unnecessary actions. Sound alerts also help, thanks to which you don’t have to access the display at all. It is enough to configure the sensor to measure distances with cutoffs and the clock will signal to the user each time as the distance passes, with a characteristic sound.
Features and advantages of the model
Talking about the benefits, of course, falls on the background of similar models from segments close to the initial level. Nevertheless, even professional athletes will be able to find interesting options for themselves. So, it’s worth highlighting the possibilities of fixing and tracking achievements, feedback and altimeter. By the way, you can set records by several criteria in the Polar M400 system. The manual also recommends accessing the Flow home Internet service. Here you can keep a sports diary.
However, this toolkit is more likely for amateurs, since there is little practical benefit from it. From the point of view of analyzing their indicators, the service is not bad, but many lack the social component of interaction with other owners of Polar M400 watches, as well as thought-out reporting.
Positive feedback about the model
First of all, the model attracts with its price, which varies from 10 to 15 thousand rubles. In the watch class with integrated GPS, this is one of the most affordable options. Owners also praise loud sound with signals, a durable battery that lasts about a month, as well as a Polar M400 contrast screen. Reviews especially highlight the wide possibilities for the formation of content on the display. For example, you can place lines with the most relevant information, increase the font, etc. Work and functionality are also not satisfactory. The model is equipped with a simple filling without frills, and this could not but affect the speed and efficiency.
Negative reviews
Almost everything that is in the device is a plus, and has a downside. In particular, high performance was achieved due to the exclusion of many functions that have become familiar in other smart watches. Users complain about the old firmware, the lack of the Heart Touch option, and also note a lack of multisport and a bicycle sensor. By the way, the exclusion of the vibration motor function in the Polar M400 was a very disappointing flaw for many. Reviews of Windows Phone fans criticize the creators for the fact that there are no applications for this OS, while similar competitor models are actively exploring this field.
Conclusion
The model outperforms competitors in terms of hardware implementation. The potential of the watch is decent, but the developers were not able to fully use it. The functionality of the Polar M400 is significantly reduced in comparison with alternative products, and the gadget has lost elementary options.
The web service, which had the opportunity to become a strong point of the device, also suffered, but this did not happen. Despite all the shortcomings, the model has a high-quality assembly, a reliable platform and a conveniently implemented interface. For those who are satisfied with the existing functionality, this watch can be a real find - especially given the rather modest price tag.