The most important day for each student is the day of defense of the thesis. In addition to the graduation work, a protective word and a presentation, the student will need a review, which can be prepared by his supervisor, director of the enterprise where the student had practice, or even by the student himself. This material describes the basic requirements for writing reviews, as well as examples of writing reviews for the thesis.
What is a review?
A review of a thesis (term paper or any other qualification work) is a mandatory official document in which the reviewer leaves feedback on what has been read. This document is necessary in order for the student to be admitted to protection. It includes many aspects. A worthy example of a review of a thesis is one in which, in addition to the final grade, there is a brief summary of the work and its analysis. Immediately, the reviewer considers all the shortcomings, errors and comments, describing them as detailed and objective as possible. It is important to understand that a lot depends on the review. Often, this document is crucial at the time of student evaluation. A good review makes a good impression on the selection committee, which ultimately can play into the hands of someone who worked on the graduation project.
Who is a reviewer?
Naturally, it is not the person from the street who needs to check and evaluate the student’s project, but a professional in the topic to which the thesis is devoted. A reviewer is a graduate who can objectively and impartially evaluate a student’s work. Ideally, this should be done by the most independent person from the outside, whose decision cannot be influenced by personal perception and relationships with the author of the work. Usually this is done by the director of the enterprise or organization where the student had practice. In this case, the review is issued on a special document of the organization. The reviewer must fully own the topic, understand all aspects of the work, correctly describe all the pros and cons. Among other things, the document itself must be properly executed. There must be confirmation in the form of a seal and the signature of the head (without this, the review will be invalid). Very often, directors and teachers ask the student to write and draw up a document on their own, and the teacher can only put a stamp and signature. Once this practice exists, then each student should be ready to write a review on their own. To do this, you need to get acquainted with good examples of writing a review and detailed instructions for its design.
general information
How to write a review? With an example of finished work, of course, and on established, generally accepted points. Special problems with the main part of the review should not arise. A student better than anyone knows all the advantages and disadvantages of his thesis and will be able to describe them most competently.
The following important job requirements, which are checked and described in the review, should be taken into account:
- structuredness;
- relevance;
- uniqueness;
- completeness of the material;
- design in accordance with the requirements of GOST.
For convenience, the review can be divided into three main elements:
- Introductory part, where the reviewer will describe the relevance of the topic.
- The main part, where aspects of work, advantages and disadvantages are considered in more detail (the largest part).
- The conclusion, where the main conclusion is made (includes the mark and the verdict of the teacher about whether the student is allowed to defend or not).
It is better to avoid common phrases and various cliches. The review should have more specificity and less water.
Cap
Everything is as simple as possible here. On the Internet there are many examples of reviews of works of an artistic nature and other similar works with a specific design, but when it comes to a diploma, everything should be ascetic as possible.
The word “Review” is written in the upper part, then the subject of the work, position and full name the author.
For example, “The review of the article“ Use of modern IT-technologies in teaching the French language ”by the candidate of pedagogical sciences, associate professor of the Department of Foreign Languages ​​of MVU, Song of Olga Petrovna.
Assessment of scientific novelty and relevance
Any scientific work is based on these two aspects, and they are most important for the student's work. Relevance may consist in the use of new techniques, the development of a unique set of measures to eliminate existing problems in the field of activity, which is considered in the thesis, or a fresh look at familiar things. One way or another, this moment should be described in the work itself and reflected in the review of it. If you are personally involved in the recall, then to simplify your task, you can find this item in your graduation project and, to paraphrase, add it to the review. Regarding relevance and novelty, it is enough to write 2-3 sentences.
Brief Content Analysis
Examples of reviews of manuals and different types of work are very different. A brief analysis is another important point in which the main idea of ​​the entire project will be displayed. What was the essence of the work, what is its purpose and what results did the author plan to achieve. Immediately you need to fit information on whether the goal set by the author was achieved, what ideas were implemented during the study.
For example, the author carried out serious work to study the possibilities of using modern IT technologies in teaching French. New learning tools have been proposed to help develop reading, speaking, listening and writing skills. The goal - to create a set of exercises using modern technology has been achieved.
Work advantages
There are many examples of reviews of research programs and dissertations from teachers and directors of various enterprises, where this item is described rather dryly, since the reviewer was not particularly inspired by the project. If a student has to write a review on his own, then he gets the opportunity to praise himself properly, describing the positive aspects of his research and its advantages in all its glory. The main thing is not to overdo it, otherwise you will only achieve the fact that the commission will flood you with questions of defense and create many problems.
Disadvantages of a term paper or diploma
And here difficulties may begin. In fact, who wants to slander himself and reflect on any shortcomings of his own project? You still have to do this. Objectively describe the problems and shortcomings are unlikely to succeed. It is better to rely on those flaws that were identified by your supervisor. Talk with your academic adviser or practice supervisor, who, if not them, knows best what shortcomings your qualification job has?
The main thing is to feel the edge and do not write to yourself too much. Too critical attitude towards oneself can lead to a dead end and completely deprive the opportunity to speak on defense.
The practical value of the study
If you look at examples of writing reviews of the thesis, you are unlikely to find this item there. Usually, the practical value of the study is indicated only if it is a candidate's work or dissertation. Nevertheless, if your project has such an item, then this must be said. Of course, to indicate the fact of the existence of practical value is not enough, the reviewer is obliged to express his position and say how exactly the work performed can be useful.
Rating
Evaluation of work should be general and private. This means that the reviewer should fully evaluate all the work and each individual chapter.
The general assessment includes such moments as the correct presentation and proportionality of each chapter and paragraph, the consistency of the material, the presence of well-constructed conclusions on each part. The presence of professional terms, applications, images, tables, histograms and other visual accents.
The first chapter assesses how the author submits information, compliance with the scientific style of presentation, general literacy rate. The author’s ability to clearly formulate a thought and convey his opinion on the topic under study.
The second chapter assesses how deeply the topic has been studied, how much qualitative analysis has been carried out by the author, what conclusions have been drawn as a result. All student activities in collecting and processing information from sources, statistics, and interpretation of the data obtained are signed in this paragraph.
The third chapter describes the possibility of practical application of those recommendations that the student gives in his work. Ideas that were implemented in the course of undergraduate practice. Concrete offers and ready-made options for their use in real life and work. This part can be included in the second chapter, if it is practical.
Review Design
If you look at examples of reviews of term paper or thesis, it becomes clear that visually they are made out in the same way as the diploma or the course. Requirements:
- font - Times New Roman;
- font size - 14 points;
- page margins - 2 centimeters;
- headers and footers - the page number in the center below.
Example
How to write a review? The easiest way to do this is based on a specific job. Below will be proposed one sample that you can focus on.
Review
On the final qualifying work on the topic "Use of IT-technologies in teaching the French language", student Ptitsina Elizaveta Sergeevna.
The relevance of the presented work is determined by a number of factors. Among them are the need to meet the level of education with the new requirements that are assigned to graduates, and the widespread dissemination of IT technologies that affect various spheres of life.
Ptitsina E.V. processed a large amount of information, including scientific papers and study guides. The methodological and theoretical foundations are at a high level. The information presented in the thesis has a clear sequence, structured and presented in accordance with the scientific style. The volume of the thesis is 97 pages, including 4 applications, 7 figures, 2 tables and 5 diagrams.
In the first chapter, the author conducted a deep and detailed analysis of theoretical information on the selected topic. The very concept of IT-technologies, the main aspects and problems of teaching the French language are disclosed in detail. The goals of work and the methodology for analyzing the effectiveness of using IT technologies in education are determined.
The second chapter identifies the features of instruction in a secondary school. The author presents a characteristic of the school and offers an experiment to identify the effectiveness of his training program. The instruments that were used in the course of practice are described. A set of lessons has been prepared using modern IT technologies. The author conducted an analysis of the work done and provided specific data on improving the effectiveness of training using IT technologies.
The student showed the ability to correctly express their thoughts. The conclusions formulated have strong justification and can be used in practice. No serious shortcomings were found in the work. It is made in accordance with the requirements of GOST. Recommended rating is excellent.
This example of a job review (term or graduate) is a little simplified, but can be used along with more detailed reviews.
Before writing, you must once again familiarize yourself with the final work. Check it for compliance. Read a few examples of reviews of theses. Based on the results of the check, you need to once again check the uniqueness of the project and re-read the finished review several times.