The composition "My attitude to Chatsky" is included in the list of obligatory ones, because it allows you to analyze the main character from different points of view. After all, his views on life are very different from the generally accepted, and bold ideas plunge Moscow society into amazement. But, in spite of all the correctness of the beliefs, who is Chatsky, the winner or the vanquished?
A little bit about the main character
Before proceeding to answer the question of whether he managed to win, in the composition "My attitude to Chatsky" you need to talk about the personality and lifestyle of this character. The main character of the reader is already introduced in the conversation to other characters in the play. And then it becomes clear that Alexander Andreevich has a lover with whom they grew up - Sophia.
But the girl does not wait for his return at all, she even becomes embarrassed when the maid reminds her of the scene of farewell during the departure of the young man. Nevertheless, she recognizes his dignity. Alexander Andreevich is smart, witty, sensitive and well educated.
The idea of his life can be made up only of fragments of the speech of other heroes. He began his career with Molchalin, it developed successfully, but he could not get used to the bureaucratic system. The young man was also a military man, but he left this occupation as well. Despite the fact that Chatsky did not stay long in any place, this does not mean the frivolity of the young man. He did not stay in these fields, because "I would be glad to serve - to be sick sick."
Chatsky is a representative of a generation of innovators who believed that society needed reforms to move forward. He did not accept the outdated ideas of Moscow society. A comparative description of Chatsky by one of the representatives of the Famus society will best show his character.
Comparison of Alexander Andreevich and Molchalin
Why in the composition "My attitude to Chatsky" would be appropriate to compare these two characters? Because the main theme of the play is the conflict between the "century bygone" and the "new century" that is replacing it. But Chatsky and Molchalin are representatives of this conflict.
Molchalin is a modest, inconspicuous young man who never expressed his opinion. He believed that the main thing in life is to have a good place of work and ranks, which can be obtained by sucking. Molchalin hardly feels the same feelings for Sophia as she does for him. He just understands: if he becomes her husband, he will occupy a good position in society. And this was very important for Famusov and his friends.
Chatsky, on the contrary, was not afraid to openly express his opinion and argue with others. He did not understand how the attitude to a person could depend on the number of awards. For a young man, the main thing was the personality itself, his convictions. Alexander Andreevich wanted to benefit society, but not by worshiping the highest ranks, but by changing obsolete orders and improving the life of the entire population of the country.
Chatsky and Sophia
But the complexity of the position of the protagonist is not limited to the hostility of the Famus society to him. In the essay “My attitude to Chatsky,” we can briefly write that his only support was his love for Sophia. The hope that the girl would become his wife did not let him despair.
To the last, he refused to believe that she preferred Molchalin to him. When Chatsky becomes aware that Sophia started a rumor about his insanity, the last thing that kept him in Moscow was lost. Indeed, for her sake, he returned back, keeping in his heart the image that he had taken with him. And the destruction of this illusion helps Chatsky decide to leave.
Contrasting to the Famusov Society
In the composition "My attitude to Chatsky" one of the key points will be the relationship between the hero and Famus society. In this conflict, not just a clash of personalities - this is a reflection of the mood in society that reigned in the days of the writer. This is the time of future reforms that should have taken place in society.
Through the play, the struggle of the Moscow nobles, landowners, who did not want to change anything with people who looked wider than they did, and understood that society needed changes, was shown. Indeed, it is this bureaucracy, corruption that is an anchor for a developed society. This is a call to the fact that you do not need to evaluate people according to their social status and ranks, but you need to pay attention to the individual.
"Million torment" Chatsky
What is the tragedy of the protagonist of the play? Just Sophia’s refusal? Or is the fact that society is hostile to him? The very name of the play tells the reader that Chatsky’s problem is to realize the futility of his attempts to change Famusov and his entourage.
It seems to him that he will not be able to do anything alone. And so the main character decides to leave. It is difficult to give an unambiguous answer to the question of whether Chatsky is the winner or the vanquished. Because it seems that he did nothing - society remained the same. But in fact, Chatsky made them afraid and was able to show them that change is inevitable, that the “future century” will replace the “past century”. And then other people will prove to them (and maybe Chatsky himself and his comrades) that the ideas of the protagonist were correct, that he was the winner.