All legal norms are designed to ensure the regulation and streamlining of public relations. This is done depending on the functions available and the tasks they face.
Any legal system includes procedural and substantive law. The first group ensures the consolidation of existing social relations, giving them, thus, a legal character. Substantive law aims to implement these provisions. By setting them, the state together with this determines the order of their implementation. Thus, substantive law is a complex that includes constitutional, civil, administrative, criminal acts. This system provides the impact of government power on relations in society through direct, direct regulation.
The norms of substantive law, the procedure for their implementation are fixed by procedural provisions, which also provide the conditions for their protection.
The division of the system is carried out in accordance with the hierarchy of provisions and the subject of regulation not only into individual disciplines, but also into institutions. The latter, in particular, include suffrage or pension law, property rights and other areas. This system, therefore, reflects the existing economic relations in the state , the current political system of the country. Material law, in addition, provides services to these structures, changing and developing along with them.
It should be noted that the transition from the centralized economic management of the Soviet state to free relations in the market required substantial reform in many legal sectors. So, during the first half of the nineties, substantive law underwent significant changes. A new Criminal Code, Civil Code and other major legislative documents were adopted.
The subject of substantive law is public relations. They are usually associated with living conditions in society. Moreover, the norms of procedural law provide for the regulation of social relations that are formed in the course of the implementation of substantive rights. Thus, the process industry is in some way a form of implementation. This form is determined by the state.
However, one should not think that substantive law has a greater impact on the rule of law in the state than the procedural provisions. The state of law and order in the country is primarily ensured by procedural acts.
Normative acts of substantive law provide for the regulation of existing civil and public relations. Along with this, without procedural provisions and legislation, legal relations cannot arise. In other words, these norms act as a certain form of existence of material provisions, providing the process of their implementation. Thus, the main distinguishing feature of procedural acts is their procedural nature.
The norms of procedural and substantive law are closely interconnected. The state of law and order and the rule of law in the state will largely depend on their coordinated interaction.
It should be noted at the same time that the division of legal norms into procedural and substantive norms is clearly considered due to the legislative nature of the relevant sectors. In terms of general theoretical, this issue is quite complicated. The task of science is to define a clear general legal criterion for distinguishing between procedural and substantive legal procedures that could be applied when working on legislation and legal systems.