There is a well-known saying: "Talents need help, mediocrity will break through themselves." It, of course, contains an ironic meaning, but the truth of life, too. This is just about mediocrity, this is our object of study.
Value
When you are called mediocrity, then you should not be upset. Just remember that when a baby is born, he comes into this world with utter mediocrity, and then learns and progresses surprisingly quickly. Almost any science can be mastered in the presence of desire and minimal abilities.
If a specific activity does not obey after many attempts, perhaps you should try yourself in something else. The world is large and diverse, and robots have not yet robbed people of their work, so you should not despair.
We will begin to overcome ignorance by referring to the explanatory dictionary. What does he think of this "mediocrity"? The answer follows: "The same as mediocrity (in the second meaning)."
Therefore, it is necessary to understand the meaning of the noun “mediocrity”. Here it is: "A man who is not capable of anything, devoid of talent." There is a note that this is a colloquial option and dismissive.
Synonyms
Someone may not like the sound of the object of study or it seems that this word is too vernacular in certain contexts, so we will provide the reader with a set of semantic replacements, and he can dispose of them as he wishes. Synonyms:
- grayness;
- mediocre;
- sad sack;
- mediocrity;
- unrecognized genius.
The last synonym is especially interesting. The reader must have met people who told him stories about how they were oppressed, not allowed to get to the very top, and now they exist here without any prospects.
But there may be other analogues of the word "mediocrity", this is obvious. For example, when it comes to the poet. If he does not have talent, then he is called a "rhymeplet." A writer who does not like someone or is truly lacking in a gift is called:
- "graphomaniac";
- "scribble";
- "a bourgeois painter."
People with strong nerves perceive all this as noise. You never know what and who says, not everything needs to be believed. In addition, a professional is distinguished from a layman by practice, if a journalist works and earns a living by articles, then he is definitely not a graphomaniac. Although experts can argue. The border separating the "real" writer from the "fake" is ghostly, and most importantly, there are almost no criteria. Since this is an eternal question, and the conversation is endless we will stop here.
Any characteristic is only an opinion.
Do not forget that mediocrity is a value judgment. And why they say so, no one knows. Either because the person really gives out products that do not stand up to any criticism, or the vindictors are fiercely envious and are trying to relieve at least negative reviews of the tension that arises in their souls.
The “mediocrities” do not need to think about this, they need to focus only on themselves and, of course, on the employer. If a non-talented person lives by his own labor, and there are those who are willing to pay for it, then what difference does what others think?
As we see, the meaning of the word "mediocrity" can be interpreted in different ways. And this characteristic is not as simple as it seems at first glance.