One of the most common methods of examining the body in modern alternative medicine, which causes heated debate, is bioresonance diagnostics. Reviews of doctors and patients about this procedure are characterized by a predominance of negative opinions. Positive, despite the fact that they are fewer, successfully complement the picture of consumer attitudes towards this diagnostic invention.
It should be noted that most reviews are based on personal experience of patients and doctors, which cannot be verified. This raises doubts about the reliability of the estimates, especially in the case of absolutely positive responses without analysis of the unsuccessful sides of the method.
For these reasons, bioresonance diagnostics (DBD) should be discussed at least comprehensively. It is important that both her defenders and opponents can speak out.
This article attempts to present both points of view to the reader.
DBD advocates talk about the method
Bioresonance research is an accurate diagnostic tool. It helps the doctor to solve a number of problems:
- identification of the root cause of the patient's well-being;
- identification of infectious foci in the body and clarification of their features;
- identification of all distinguishable functional abnormalities and painful reactions that marked tissues and organs:
- degenerative;
- autoimmune;
- allergic; - identification of possible solutions
Every living organism - a fungus, a bacterium, a virus, as well as the cell and tissue of any human organ, emits electromagnetic waves, the spectrum of which is characteristic only for a given biological object. Moreover, in the normal and painful state of each biological unit, these spectra differ significantly.
To make a diagnosis, it is necessary through a biologically active point (usually on the hands or fingers) to catch painful vibration spectra with a special device. For this purpose, pathological spectral samples known to the doctor are sent to the body for each organ, as well as for pathogens. Disease signals (if any) coming from the body resonate with the incoming ones, and then pathology is recorded.
The basis for treatment by electromagnetic exposure is a thoroughly conducted bioresonance diagnosis. Reviews of the treatment, in their positive part, relate to diseases that are mainly psychosomatic in nature. Such, for example, allergic reactions, skin diseases, etc. This suggests that for the success of treatment, the patient must be suggestible in order to believe what the doctor tells him. When preparing doctors for BRD and BRT, they are taught the psychological impact on the patient in order to convince him of a successful diagnosis and treatment.
The treatment itself can be carried out in two different ways: endogenous and exogenous .
With endogenous treatment, the diagnostic tool reads the body's electromagnetic waves . Then the equipment separates the signals of normal and painful conditions and sends them back. At the same time, “health signals” are amplified, and “disease signals” are minimized, that is, suppressed. The body resonates to “healthy” frequencies and begins to work on them.
With the exogenous method, a special generator of weak signals is used, which are transmitted to the body. Their frequency is selected in such a way as to cause a strong protective response. In this case, the body’s operating mode is tuned to the resonant “frequency of health”.
The bioresonance diagnosis of parasites in the body is actively promoted. The authors of the technique believe that worms, giardia, etc., parasitizing inside the body can be detected even at the stage of their origin. In particular, bioresonance diagnostics is also very strong with this. Doctors' reviews, however, do not confirm the guarantee of early detection of parasites.
Opponents of the BRD criticize the method
Not everyone seems to benefit from bioresonance diagnostics. Reviews expressing a negative opinion about her are harshly criticized. In order to maintain the objectivity of the stated content in this article, we have to give a diagram of these objections.
- In physiological studies, including the newest and progressive ones, the very existence of bioresonance is not confirmed.
- There are no serious clinical studies proving the effectiveness of BRD and BRT. Official science has not even confirmed their affiliation with medicine.
- Too many devices recommended by the inventors for DBD do not create a bioresonance effect per se.
- The only confirmed result of exposure to devices for BRD and BRT is the short effect of temporary anesthesia. In all other cases, they do not correspond to any properties declared by the authors.
- Unipolar electricity, which affects the patient with BRT, causes a cell mutation. The latter leads directly to cancer.
Bioresonance body diagnostics is a poorly studied area of alternative medicine. It is quite obvious that its creators do not know everything about the nature and application of this method. It is hoped that serious research will appear on the possibilities of integrating this technique into classical medicine.
At the same time, now people who are disappointed in the traditional diagnosis and treatment have the opportunity to make an alternative choice. If only he was not dangerous.