What are reviews and what are the rules for their preparation?

What are reviews? This is a genre in journalism, which includes a review of a literary (artistic, cinematographic, theatrical) work in writing, contains a review and a critical assessment of the reviewer. The task of the author of the review includes an objective description of the advantages and disadvantages of the work being analyzed, its style, the skills of a writer or director in the image of heroes. To justify their point of view, quotes are given. It is characterized by a small volume and conciseness.

Review Feature

To understand what a review is and how to write it, you need to learn about the main characteristics of this genre:

1. The review should contain a deep analysis of the work and its evaluation.
2. Depending on the purpose of writing, various styles can be used: journalistic, popular science, or scientific.
3. Type of speech is reasoning.
4. The review is written according to a certain plan in a restrained tone, in contrast to the review, which can be in free form.

There are several basic peer review principles:

1. This genre is characterized by a deep analysis of the text, argumentation with reference to the content of the work, and brief conclusions about its main idea.
2. The quality of the analysis depends on the level and ability of the reviewer.
3. The reviewer should express his thoughts rationally and logically, without using emotionally colored replicas.
4. The advantages of the author of the review are: erudition, a high level of training, language culture, analytical thinking.

Review Plan

What should a review look like? A sample writing or work plan should include:

1. Mandatory introduction with the data of the peer-reviewed work: who is the creator, what problem is it dedicated to, why is this topic relevant. It is important to correctly determine the goal and tasks that the author sets himself.
2. The main part raises questions about what is in the center of attention of the work and what is the focus on. The reviewer evaluates the content and form of the literary text.
3. Next, go on to describe the shortcomings of the work, to reveal the flaws of its author.
4. In conclusion, a generalized analysis of the work is given, the main conclusions are made.

What is a book review?

Trying to find the answer to the question of how the book review differs from other types, it is necessary to determine the main purpose of writing such works. For a literary work, criticism and objective evaluation are very important, especially for new products, about which the average reader still does not know anything. That reviews allow you to evaluate the book before buying. They can be internal (written for the editor) or external (appearing after publication). Do not confuse these works with reviews, where there is only a personal attitude to the work.

There are several common mistakes in writing a book review:

1. Replacing the analysis of the plot with his brief retelling.
2. Lack of argumentation and quotations when evaluating work.
3. Overloading with secondary details to the detriment of the main content.
4. Focusing on ideological features, not the aesthetics of the text.

When evaluating a work of art, attention must also be paid to the persuasiveness and novelty of the text. It is important that a place is allocated in the work for discussing human values ​​and principles of building a society.

What is a movie review?

To write a review of a cinematic work, it is reviewed at least twice. After the first viewing, the impressions of the script, acting and special effects are recorded on paper. It is better to start work immediately, with fresh sensations. Then you need to look for information about the director, the main actors, their main achievements and awards.

If you are not talking about the premiere, you can refer to other reviews, compare them with each other. This will allow you to write an interesting and original text without repeating what has already been said. The second viewing is needed to streamline your feelings and give an objective assessment of the cinematic work. We should also mention the musical accompaniment of the film and share information about the authors of the soundtrack.

Movie Review Plan

To understand what reviews of cinematographic works are and how to write them best, you need to make a plan in advance with the following points:

1. Summary of the film.
2. Impressions of the reviewer from viewing.
3. Assessment of acting, character development, directing and camera work.
4. Recommendations to help readers understand whether or not to watch this movie.

A few more explanations of what reviews are and what tasks they should perform: the author needs to describe the pros and cons of the picture, point out the symbolism of certain episodes that are difficult for the ordinary viewer to understand on their own. Separately, you can write about the landscapes and interiors, against which the events take place, about the work of the dresser and the accuracy in the transfer of details, especially if the movie is historical.

Before publishing your work, it is advisable to reread it aloud 1-2 times, with breaks of 20-30 minutes, which will make it possible to avoid many errors and adjust the style of the text. These small recommendations will help future authors to understand what reviews are and will make a memorable and useful analysis of a literary or cinematic work.