In the course of studying the Russian language, students conduct a morphological analysis of the participle. We will consider examples of analysis of this mysterious part of speech in our article. And also let's try to figure out step by step what difficulties await the guys in this work.
Part of speech
Communion and participle are the most mysterious groups of speech in our language. It is believed that most spelling and punctuation errors are associated with them. This is due to the fact that scientists still have not decided which category they belong to - independent or not. They borrowed most of their attributes from the verb. And therefore, performing a morphological analysis of the sacrament and gerimony, we will see how they are similar to their "progenitor".
However, the presence of their own grammatical categories allows us to call them independent parts. In such a controversial situation, unfortunately, there is no unequivocal opinion of linguists. But at the same time, both the participial and participial turnovers have their own plan for morphological analysis. This once again shows how special these groups of speech are.
Signs
Now we can proceed to the detailed study of the morphological analysis of the participle. Examples of such works are given below. The features of this part, denoting an additional action, include the form, as well as the recurrence. Let's consider them in more detail.
Species - the very grammatical category that came from the verb. There are two variants of species forms: perfect and imperfect. We characterize each of them.
An imperfect view denotes an action that is still completed at a certain point. His distinctive question is "what to do?" the verb and “what are you doing?” at the Communion Party.
For example: speak - speak.
This form is used when the process of action is still proceeding or occurred once in the past, but has not yet ended.
The following species is called perfect. Already by its name it is clear that it is opposite in meaning to imperfect. This view conveys an action completed by time. The question characteristic of him is “what have you done?”
For example: To come running (what to do?) - a verb, running up (what to do?) - participle.
The next permanent category is recurrence. This is called the ability to translate the action on yourself. It is easy to distinguish such an participle: it has a characteristic suffix.
For example: to admire (verb) - while admiring (participle).
Syntax Features
The morphological analysis of germs, examples of which we will consider after studying all its details, is not an easy task. After studying its features, you can move on to the syntactic role that it plays. Since the main feature of the participle is immutability, borrowed from the dialect, then their questions will be similar. In a sentence, as a rule, it plays the role of circumstances.
For example: Walking along the street without a hat, the child fell ill with a cold.
We ask a question from the verb "ill" to the germs "walking" (how?). Thus, it is a circumstance denoting a course of action.
But it is worth taking into account the fact that it is not solitary. That is, this participle in this example has words depending on it: walking (where?) - along the street and walking (how?) - without a hat. And, as you know, their presence indicates that we are facing a separate circumstance. In this sentence, it is expressed by the adverbial turnover. What to do in this case, proceeding to underline this member of the sentence? Without a doubt, highlight the entire design of the turnover as a circumstance. In linguistics, it is customary to underline it with a dotted line with dots between it. Do not forget that such a turn is always highlighted with commas. It doesn’t matter in what position the main word is for him.
Parse plan
It's time to complete the morphological analysis of the participle. We give the sample immediately after drawing up a clear algorithm.
- We determine the part of speech by asking the question (what are you doing? What are you doing?).
- We put the word in the initial form, defining the verb that formed it, and the characteristic suffix.
- We analyze the morphological features: we determine the type (owl / nons.), Look at the suffix and ascertain the recurrence in the presence of -sya.
- We characterize this part of speech as a member of a sentence.
Such a simple plan has a morphological analysis of the germs.
Examples
Having collected the necessary information about this part of speech, we can proceed to its analysis.
Consider an example: A loud rumbling, streams ran with the onset of spring.
In this proposal, we will conduct a morphological analysis of the germs of "murmur".
- What doing - Murmur (germs).
- We find signs. The view is imperfect, as it answers the question “what are you doing?”. The action is unfinished, continuing during that period of time. Since the suffix is absent, this participle is irrevocable.
- The syntactic role is a circumstance. Firstly, it depends on the verb, and secondly, it has dependent words and is part of a turnover (gurgling loudly). According to this, we completely distinguish it as a separate circumstance.
The following example, which we will analyze, is this: The wind blew the forest cool, rustling with the leaves of the trees.
Here we need to perform a morphological analysis of the gossip “rustling”.
- What doing - rustling (participle).
- We find signs. The view is imperfect, because the word answers the question “what are you doing?”. It is formed from the verb "murmur" plus the suffix -a. The absence of a suffix confirms that the participle is irrevocable.
- The sentence is a circumstance. It depends on the verb “blew” and answers the question “how?”.
In addition, it subordinates the phrase "foliage of trees." This suggests that we have before us the sacrament involved. We emphasize it as a whole with a dotted line with dots.
Conclusion
In this article, we have studied one of the most unusual parts of speech. Having examined the participle from different angles, we were able to analyze it, as well as draw up an algorithm for its implementation. If you know all the subtleties, then no difficulties in parsing should arise. We wish you good luck in this work!