Aggressive-progressive youth probably knows the term "suitability." What is this, they do not need to explain. But older people need clarification. Consider the meaning of the word, as well as discuss its strengths and weaknesses.
Value
The meaning, even if you do not know for sure, can be understood. A new-fashioned word has one root with the words “good”, “suitable”, “good”. It immediately becomes clear that such an assessment is positive. It is difficult to say why the noun “suitability” given above was not liked as an assessment, but it didn’t take root ... And the “suitability” (what it is we are just exploring) is a popular concept that is still on the Web and not only .
Briefly formulating the definition, the following will come out: "Goodness is a term by which people evaluate something as positive, credible, what they like."
The vagueness of the concept: the strength and weakness of the word
By definition, it is clear that the concept is rather vague, and this feeling is true. Under the assessment of "suitability" falls both a weak, barely noticeable affection, and a flurry of delight. Here we recall one psychological detail: only that which he can understand and express acts on a person. Imagine that people canceled the rating scale, there are no more "fives", "fours", "triples". There is only "passed" or "did not pass." If the world lives on this principle, then the person will soon lose the sharpness of perception of the world, he will think only in the category of "yes or no." Maybe for definiteness this is not bad, but the shades will disappear.
So in the issue of validity (what is it, we have already learned) the brevity and a large number of feelings, usually complex, conveyed by this word, have positive aspects. For example, this assessment saves time when you need to speak quickly and in business. But the habit of such words kills the expressiveness of the language, and along with the speech, people are simplified.
Why is it worth replacing the term "validity" and how to do it?
We do not lose touch with the previous argument. Of course, you can’t just shut yourself away from new trends in life and in language, but maybe not everything modern is so good? Speed ​​and efficiency are valued above all, but when it comes to human communication, is it worth it to rush? Perhaps it is better to express your thoughts more fully and deeper?
But how can we replace the definition of “suitability” (what does this mean, we already understood)? To find an analogue is quite simple - personal creativity. A person sees a movie or reads a book, and now he is asked about what he thinks. And instead of a monosyllabic answer, he composes a long passage about the advantages and disadvantages of a work of art. Yes, it’s much more difficult, you need a habit. But let the reader not doubt it, this will serve him well in the future. In order not to think with Internet cliches, you need to read Russian classics more and think-think-think, analyze, be aware of your attitude to the outside world, and then the assessment of “suitability” (what it is, we revealed in the article) will no longer seem appropriate in almost any situation.