What is sequence? Meaning, synonyms and interpretation

Consistency is not only following one after another, but also a certain character trait. In any case, consider all the meanings of a noun.

Value

You can not go on a trip and not take with you an explanatory dictionary. Our eternal companion insists that the values ​​of the object of study are as follows:

1. Similar to the adjective "sequential."
2. In mathematics, an infinite ordered set of numbers.

To understand the full range of meanings, it is necessary to reveal the meaning of the adjective "sequential". It has two meanings:

1. Continuously following another. For example: "Consistent punitive measures."
2. Logically substantiated, arising from certain grounds.

To illustrate the first and second meanings of the word, remember the football or hockey battles. When a judge removes players from the playing field, then we can talk about the sequence in two senses at once. For example, if he sets the same bar for all athletes, then he is consistent in the second sense, that is, his judgments are logically justified and stand on a single foundation. If he, punishing a fight, first removes the instigators, then all the participants, then he is consistent in the first sense: he applies punitive measures sequentially, in turn.

Synonyms

When it comes to such an interesting word, he simply needs replacements. So the list is:

• order;
• turn;
• set;
• row;
• consistency;
• objectivity;
• justice;
• impartiality;
• methodology;
• dispassion.

Only 10 synonyms are enough to understand the essence of the phenomenon. The 4 upper nouns refer to the "mathematical" value of the object of study, the rest to the "psychological", if I may say so. Consistency is an interesting word, but the question remains: is it possible to be consistent and how difficult is it?

Sequence as a character trait

Why are judges who are fair so valued? Because such impartial people are found infrequently, even if you do not take sporting events, but turn to everyday practice. Are there many bosses who would not distinguish someone among others, teachers who did not have favorites in the class? Such cases can be counted on the fingers. This is because a person is weak, but there is one more detail: consistency is something that requires self-denial. The last is a little on the shoulder. Perhaps the most difficult thing is to follow our own principles.

I recall Arthur Schopenhauer, who talked about suicide at a beautifully set dining table. The protagonist of his philosophy was an ascetic who threw all his strength into conquering life, tearing out this evil root from its own being, which makes people suffer. But the German thinker himself did not limit himself in any way, he lived quietly and modestly, did not bathe in luxury, but did not starve either. In his defense, he said: sometimes a person spends all his strength just to create a concept, a philosophical system, and there is no longer any strength left to follow it. Someone will say that this is very convenient, but maybe it's true. Philosophers, far from all, can boast of observing their own principles, which is why people value them so low. But you can look at it from the other side: consistency is an extremely difficult matter.

Is it possible to become consistent?

Much depends on the character, and it is formed in early childhood, then only details and individual features are given correction. But historical experience says that a person can do anything if he wants. Do you think that only Martin Eden can boast of iron will? No, among real writers there were also models worthy of imitation, but not in all, of course.

For example, Yukio Mishima, who overcame the original frailty of the body and raised himself a samurai. The last point is not an exaggeration, but a historical fact, those who know how he died will not argue. So it’s possible to educate yourself. Another thing is the price at which the sequence is given (we have already considered the lexical meaning of the word). After all, you need to act like a referee on the field, to evaluate everyone, and yourself, including, by a uniform standard. Do not give discounts to anyone, do not allow double standards. Such a life is a very difficult task for an ordinary person who is used to indulgence. For example, he is reluctant to go to the gym, and he says to himself: “Come on, next time I’ll catch up.” And at the next training man barely fulfills the norm. "Athlete" should think about the fact that Yukio Mishima would not have made any indulgences. In this case, they usually say: "Well, they are great, where do we go to them?" But this is the wrong approach. Landmarks are needed just in order to move in their direction, otherwise they turn into distant pillars, set unknown why.

Talking about the meaning of the word “sequence”, we only wanted to show that this concept is not as simple as it seems at first glance.