Reviews of the multi-part film "Blue Rose" will help determine whether it is worth watching this picture. About the negative and positive points that are noted by people, as well as about the plot, you can read in this article.
Plot tie
In the series “Blue Rose,” many people’s reviews are based on the storyline. At the center of the story is the Soviet scientist Alexander Korotkevich on the eve of his fiftieth birthday. Everyone knows him as a leading specialist in the field of genetics and a respected person.
Only here under a successful career hides misfortune in his personal life. He and his wife have only lived together for a long time, but have become so distant that they have become almost strangers. Daughter Olga became addicted to alcohol and got a bad habit. In fact, he never loved his wife, and Katya lost his beloved girl during the war in Crimea. After a long time, his friend Zabelin, as a KGB general, finds evidence that she can still be alive.
Positive reviews
About the serial film "Blue Rose" reviews in a positive context were written by about half the people. To many people, the tragic events in which the main characters participated were close, and they wanted to empathize with the characters. The selection of actors, according to some reviews, was successful, although this moment is considered quite controversial between the audience. Filming in Yalta with a show of the sights is excellent, especially landscapes.
The image of the main character Korotkevich is spelled out well: he has a motivation for action and a sad past. His dream - to grow a blue rose through genetic operations - is a symbol of lost love. This positive reviews about the series "Blue Rose" and the actors end. It is worth noting that even those who consider the picture a success were found to have disadvantages, and this affected the rating.
A lot of negativity
Reviews of the second half of people do not recommend watching the serial film "Blue Rose". Many users report a fake acting game that they don't want to believe. The composition for the main roles was chosen successfully, but the images do not create the necessary atmosphere of tragedy. The scriptwriters prepared many dramatic moments that should affect the strings of people in front of the screen, but this did not always happen. Sometimes viewers felt more negative, because this moment is controversial.
The second obvious drawback is the artificial delay of the plot for ten episodes. The story could be presented more succinctly and deprived of its obvious negative, but the authors did not take such a move. Instead, they decided to keep the intrigue, only now it is not felt at all. The story is predicted several steps forward, and some people are more interested in watching whether they guessed the development, rather than the plot itself. The emphasis is on tragedy, and just for the sake of easy viewing, the picture will not work.
Final opinion
Reviews of the film "Blue Rose" were divided into two camps with the difference that some reacted to the series with great negativity, while others carefully recommend it. The play of the actors is too subjective, and therefore it is worth watching the first series for a final opinion. From Nikolai Fomenko and Veronika Vernadskaya, who starred in the main roles, the moments are felt false. Other characters of the first plan were performed by Victor Rakov, Polina Kutepova, Ekaterina Rednikova and Polina Filonenko. Secondary images were tried on by Stanislav Belyaev, Evgeny Mikheev, Julia Shifershtein and others.
The main condition here is the perception of the dramatic genre with an eye on a predictable plot. The motivation of the protagonist is present, but the end may also cause some doubts. Some dialogues seem tense due to the presence of ten episodes, which is too much for a similar story. On the other hand, if already the first episode makes you empathize with the main character, then in one go you will be able to master the entire work. This is reported by half of the positive reviews.