In 2009, the world saw Quentin Tarantino's military drama . Knowing that this person gets down to business only when he is really interested, and always gives out high quality, the audience and critics with bated breath were waiting for the premiere. They talked a lot about the film, and not casual. Are Inglourious Basterds really worthy of praise? Reviews and universal recognition are the best proof of this. In this article you will also find interesting information about creating a movie masterpiece.
General facts
It all started back in the 2000s. As Tarantino admitted, he was always interested in the military theme. At the same time, he wanted to show a certain temporary piece or episode of the Second World War, and even better - certain characters. And do it with his inherent black humor. As a result, an idea was born with the working name Inglourious basterds. The director pondered for a long time whether there would be more drama or black humor in the picture. After all, he did not want an ordinary story. A filmmaker like him, with a studio budget of $ 70 million, simply had to show a masterpiece. One that will then be remembered for a long time. Later, while working, Quentin decided that there was nothing to change the working name for, let it be âInglourious Basterdsâ. The 2009 film on the track record of the director is still considered one of his best works.
Brief Results of Glory
By the way, global rental fees collected revenue exceeding $ 320 million. The picture has high ratings not only on the most famous Internet portals. Many critics praise the director. In addition, the tape has many nominations and awards, including the Oscar.
Language rules do not count
Remembering that the picture needs to add a âtwinkleâ, Tarantino decided to play on the title. Inglourious basterds contains spelling errors. By the director they were left intentionally. Initially, he borrowed the name from the film âThis Cursed Armored Trainâ, from which he drew some points for âBastardsâ. But in the end, he refused to use the article and deliberately added spelling inaccuracies. The authorâs intention is hidden in this.
Has this affected the international acclaim of Inglourious Basterds? The audienceâs reviews are unanimous - the film gives us a number of Tarantino âthingsâ, allowing it, the film, to withstand the Tarantino style. And here you can find jokes not only on the military, but also topical issues, âtricksâ, âtricksâ and a special drive, comparable only to âPulp Fictionâ.
The long road to fame
If Tarantino himself is well-known with fame, then the road to the stars of the film was a long one. And the master himself is âto blameâ for this. He was so desperate to make a âgood movieâ that he literally pored over every page of the script. He was inspired by various military paintings, talked with fellow filmmakers, and visited museums. In a word, I absorbed information that would ultimately make Quentin Tarantino's Inglourious Basterds a worthy product.
The draft script was ready back in 2002. But the work was constantly delayed. Quentin either lacked material, then he took a break, then switched to other projects. Having finished with âKill Bill,â he returned to the project, but Robert Rodriguez persuaded him to remove the Grindhouse and several low-budget films for the Asian market, after which Quentin gave himself the word to finalize the script.
It turned out so big that the question arose of how to fit all this into one film. Quentin dreamed of creating a trilogy, but then decided that there would be a bust. Then he agreed to a mini-series, but again hesitated.
As best he could, the director hid information about the upcoming project, but the ubiquitous journalists unearthed the information. And then the headlines of the newspapers were full of the main news - âBrad Pitt in the filmâ Inglourious Basterds âwill play a major role.â
Who are the stars?
Despite the fact that they had not worked with Pitt before, Tarantino definitely saw him among the main characters. Creating the image of Aldo Rain, he realized that such a strong personality Pitt is quite capable. I called the agentâs agent and did not lose.
Who else played in the movie Inglourious Basterds? Eli Roth, an old friend of Tarantino, âlit upâ in a small role. It was originally planned to give her to Adam Sandler, but he was in conflict with the studio, so he refused. Roth himself, in addition, became the director of one of the parts of the film called âPride of the Nationâ. More than three hundred extras were invited to shoot. And this is not the only chapter in the film where so many secondary persons are involved.
If the story is about German soldiers, how not to call a real German into the film? Til Schweiger, âInglourious Basterdsâ for whom he became the first joint film with a Hollywood director, was extremely pleased. As Schweiger later admitted, he is very grateful to Quentin for the opportunity to participate in this kind of tape. It was an incredible experience for him that he will not forget. Till played a German who hates the Nazis. Special achievements of the character - he killed more than ten Gestapo officers.
Rewriting a story
Tarantino from the very beginning understood that it was necessary to follow the pages of history. However, it is not at all forbidden to add copyright fiction. So who are the Inglourious Basterds? The plot of the picture is quite simple. The action takes place at the very peak of World War II. France occupied by the Germans. A group of American soldiers, including people of different nationalities, landed on the territory of the country to begin the âpurgeâ. All of them are different in character, fiction and power. Their peculiarity is not just to kill the Nazis, but to kill with particular cruelty, shown with black humor.
The final is no less interesting. An alternative ending shows us the death of Hitler, which is quite the ultimate mission of the âbastardsâ, and all the ranks of the German elite die at their hands too.
Inglourious Basterds: actors and roles
What other stars did we remember in the movie?
Austrian Christoph Waltz played the role of the Jewish hunter Hans Landa. According to the director, he lost all hope of finding a suitable actor for this image until Waltz came to audition. He literally saved the film, returning to Quentin the desire to continue working. According to the plot, the hero of Waltz has to speak four languages.
Diana Krueger might not have played the spy Bridget von Hammersmark in the film if Nastasya Kinski had not refused to participate.
The Jew of German-Austrian origin, Corporal Wicca, was played by the star of the series âCommissar Rexâ Gideon Burkhard, and Private Zoller - Daniel Bruhl.
Another German, Michael Fassbender, played English lieutenant Archie Hickox, and âSpy Austin Powersâ ââMike Myers played General Ed Fenech.
Throughout the entire period of work on the film, starting with ideas and casting, Tarantino watched dozens of famous and aspiring actors. He created each character charismatic, because he understood that it would take a long time to search for the main actors. It is known that he is friends with many Hollywood stars, but he tried to approach the selection rationally, based solely on business relationships.
So, for different roles such stars as Julie Dreyfus, Isabelle Huppert, Michael Madsen, Tim Roth, Leonardo DiCaprio, Eddie Murphy were auditioned.
Creating his masterpiece, Tarantino wanted to see in the cast of stars of different nationalities - which, however, was required by the plot. He specifically prescribed a small episode for Maggie Chun, an actress from Hong Kong, whose work he had seen before. But at the stage of the final editing, I had to cut out her scenes, since the film was already long.
The following fact is also interesting - the shooting lasted only two months. In order for the actors to feel a temporary connection with the events taking place on the screen, the shooting was carried out in the chronological order in which they are presented in the film, that is, in order.
In addition, dozens of German, Austrian, and American actors took part in the film. The director, therefore, wanted to recreate the most truthful flavor of his characters.
These are the characters from Quentin Tarantinoâs military drama Inglourious Basterds, reviews of which you have to study further.
Another war
The average film score is 8 out of 10. A fairly high score. Everyone notes - you will not see a war as you used to think it, with inherent hunger and suffering. Hitler's most important anti-hero is not represented by a strategist, but by a âdirty animalâ who is concerned about other things. And the main task of the âbastardsâ is to âwetâ the enemies witty, tough, impudent.
In addition, âInglourious Basterdsâ (2009 film) is full of casual, sometimes funny situations that add pungency. All this takes the picture to a different level of perception, showing war from a different angle. The one that Tarantino wanted to present him.
Creator corporate identity
The film is divided into chapters, each of which is presented without unnecessary haste (as if the director wanted us, the audience, to enjoy them) and has a logical conclusion. Each scene, whether it is a battle or a conversation, has its own charm. Tension, when necessary, is felt. There is no âplane," depth is felt. Beautiful plans and a common palette.
What else did Inglourious Basterds remember? Reviews from viewers and critics also praise the cast. Tarantino always knows how to select actors, forcing them not just to play, but to live the characterâs life. Was Brad Pitt charismatic? Definitely. Til Schweiger shows anger and equanimity. Christoph Waltz is so magnificent in the image that he became, perhaps, the key decoration of the film. No wonder the actor was awarded an Oscar.
Laughter improves perception
Where without him, you ask? Could you imagine the main characters different now? No, they turned out just like that - moderately funny, daring, arrogant. Quite justifying its name - âInglourious Basterdsâ. Reviews with the highest ratings are also confirmed by the fact that Tarantino, a brilliant creator, incredibly subtly and truthfully painted the main characters, making him believe that in real life there were such fighters.
For those who have yet to see the picture, one thing can be said - humor will strike you on the spot, which is not typical of military dramas, and the magnificent video sequence will make you dive and focus on details that you most likely would not notice.
Who won the war?
Among the audience there are many who do not agree with the presentation of history in this light. Yes, we have before us an alternative history of the guerrilla war waged by the Jews. They are driven by a simple goal - to punish. At the same time, the film itself is a crazy mix of humor, drama, action, atmosphere and even satire. Such an explosive elixir gives rise to the magic of cinema. It doesnât have to be about war, itâs rather a tribute to the movie.
Do not forget, before us is just an authorâs vision of what happened, sustained in the style characteristic of the director.