What is common between architecture and music? Interconnection

“Architecture is frozen music” - this winged expression first escaped from the lips of Friedrich Wilhelm Joseph Schellings in 1842. Since then, many have begun to notice the relationship between the two forms of art. Let us also learn what is common between architecture and music, what aspects unite them and why this statement played such an important role in philosophy and aesthetics.

Melody - what is it?

Before we thoroughly learn what is common between music and architecture, we will briefly consider the main provisions of each of these types of arts. The first in line will be the melody, song, work that we can hear. What does it consist of? First of all, it is the rhythm, size, pace, strokes. These aspects determine the mood of the melody, create one or another atmosphere. Moreover, in music there are numerous shades, plastic, it has a beginning and an end, an exposition and a climax. However, all this terminology is perhaps familiar only to musicians - professionals and amateurs, but how do simple listeners define and distinguish music? They catch her style. This moment is key, due to it musical tastes and preferences are formed. It is the genre in which this or that song, play, sonata, romance, etc. is written that can create a certain mood, atmosphere, aura.

what is common between architecture and music

Architecture characteristic

We can begin to talk about what is common between architecture and music after we learn the interpretation of the second term. Even a first grader can tell about what architecture is. These are all the buildings that surround us, ranging from ancient, pompous and stately churches and mansions, to modern - post-Soviet new buildings and glass skyscrapers. Architecture, as we see, is divided into a mass of genres that are very different from each other. She also has her own “color”, which creates a particular mood. Due to the development, made in a particular style, a certain aura and mood is created. In their creations, architects always express their own creative abilities, pass on to the world a piece of their soul.

what is common between architecture and music briefly

What is the difference?

Before we move on to discussing what is common between architecture and music, we will establish for themselves their differences. Firstly, architecture is a “frozen” art that is stable. Any structure is always static, you can admire it endlessly, without taking your eyes off, it does not begin and does not end - it just is. As for music, any work has an introductory part, a climax and an ending. You can enjoy the melody until the last note is played. Secondly, any structures that architects and builders worked on are designed for our eyes. We can look at them, admire, view and photograph. But music is art caught by the ears. Hearing a certain set of sounds, our brain collects them into a single melody, which we can enjoy for a short period of time.

what is the composition between architecture and music

Aesthetic similarities

Art - this "neck" combines such concepts in our lives as music and architecture. What is common between these industries at first glance? To create a building in a particular style or work for any instrument, a creator is required. In the first case, it is an architect, in the second - a composer. But both are creative individuals who think identically and pour their talents onto paper. The second similarity is style. As already noted above, any structure has its own “color”, and the same can be said about musical plays. Moreover, in music and architecture, genres have much in common. For example, the Baroque style, whose representative in architecture is Carlo Modern, and in music - Antonio Lucio Vivaldi. Over the centuries, the process of changing eras and their philosophies has affected all areas of art. They seemed to keep up with the times, so they had similar features.

music and architecture what is common

Technical similarities

It is necessary to turn to theory in order to know exactly what is common between architecture and music from a technical point of view. First, consider the size. In musical works, he is always indicated at the very beginning of the musical staff. It can be 2/4, ¾, 6/8 and so on. The rhythm of the work, its emotional color and style (i.e., 4/4 is a march, ¾ is a waltz and a minuet, etc.) depends on the size. In various buildings, size is also important. This implies not only the height of the building, its width and length. The dimensions and frequency of windows, doors, columns, portals and arches are also important, shapes and transitions are important. The second aspect is the touches. In music, they are known by such terms as staccato (sharp, jerky) and legato (smoothly, lingering). In the frozen form, we see such touches in architecture. Anyone can distinguish a building that has a sharp, deliberate character from a house created on the basis of smooth, flowing lines and transitions.

why architecture is often called frozen music

Physics - Basic Science

Many skeptics refuse to understand why architecture is often called frozen music until they see scientific evidence for it. And everything lies in the old Russian system of fathoms, according to which our ancestors built houses, churches and public buildings. It is no secret that our world is a collection of waves that resonate in the region of specific objects at a particular frequency. Due to the construction of walls at a certain distance from each other, electromagnetic columns are formed, which are combined into chords. It is believed that it was the system of fathoms that allowed creating such energy structures that enabled people to feel better in the room: the pressure returned to normal, various pains subsided. Why did this happen? The fact is that the frequency of radiation of such electromagnetic poles, which were combined into “chords”, had a similar frequency with certain notes that can be played on any instrument.

If asked at school, what is common between architecture and music

An essay on such topics is rarely given as a task for secondary school students, however, in specialized educational institutions this question may become relevant. In such cases, complex aspects from the category of physics and mathematics, of course, are not considered. Children are taught only general, aesthetic similarities. Mentioned above, they are the key answer to this question, because after all, we are talking directly about two types of art.


All Articles