The fantasy genre motion picture was created by screenwriter Joby Harold and directed by Guy Ritchie. The project was based on the famous legends of King Arthur.
In America, the premiere of the film was presented to the viewer on May 12, 2017. The Russian film fan was able to enjoy watching the film project on May 11, 2017. A fascinating film was filled with various fantastic elements and has the features of an adventure movie genre.
The cameraman was John Matheson. The musical accompaniment of the film was made by the popular American composer Daniel Pemberton. What are the reviews and critics who left reviews about the film "The Sword of King Arthur"? We will talk about this further.
Movie Duration
The duration of the film is 126 minutes. During this time period, the authors tried to fully reveal the entire storyline and idea of ​​the film. 175 million dollars were spent on creating the tape. This is quite an impressive amount of money. The filmmakers spent the main expenses on the scenery, character costumes, makeup, various tricks.
The original film was released in English and received a translation for demonstration in Russian-speaking countries. The filmmakers assumed that the project would definitely continue. It was supposed to consist of several episodes. Currently, the question of creating a sequel to the film is in question. The film failed to become a breakthrough in the world of cinema.
What genre does the film belong to?
The film "The Sword of King Arthur" (reviews of the film confirm this) managed to combine several movie genres at once: action, fantasy, adventure, drama, melodrama. As a result of this combination, a unique and fascinating film was obtained. The project is full of bright colors, computer graphics, scenes of fights and battles. Also in it you can see many elements of fiction, incredible costumes of characters, expensive and vibrant scenery.
The film shows the incredible, spectacular and dangerous adventures of the protagonist. Admirers of dramatic paintings will be able to trace a thin dramatic thread in the film. In addition, the film will also have a melodrama - the love story of the main character. The combination of several genres expands his audience and makes the film universal. It is perfect for both young people and mature moviegoers.
Actors and roles
Guy Ritchie's film "King Arthur's Sword" received positive reviews for the excellent acting. In the film, more than 160 people were involved. This is only a part of the people who entered the main and secondary staff. Also in the movie there were a huge number of people for extras. A huge number of scenes were shot with a massive number of people in the film.
Of crucial importance in the film is the key role - King Arthur. She was given to the famous actor Charlie Hunnam. The young man brilliantly passed the casting and took his rightful place in the film work.
The role of the magician went to an artist named Astrid Berger-Frisbee.
Jude Law was elected to the role of King Vortigern.
An actor named Eric Bana acted as King Uther Pendragon.
Minor actors in the film were of secondary importance. The image of Slippery Bill was played by the talented actor Aidan Gyllen. The role of Maggie was chosen by actress Annabelle Wallis. Queen Igreynu was played by actress Poppy Delevingne. The role of Katia was elected Milli Brady.
Plot of the film
“The sword of King Arthur” (2017) receives critical reviews from critics for an extraordinary storyline. The young boy Arthur, raised by the wizard Merlin, never thought about his origin. He is not ready to devote his life to chivalrous acts; he is quite satisfied with the life of an ordinary person. The hero constantly gets involved in street fights, takes everything possible from life, never thinks what will happen tomorrow. Arthur is the leader of the gang, which trades in the London outskirts.
The young man is not going to think about his life mission. He does not want to be a hero and protect weak people. A robber life pleases a guy and changes it for something else; he is not ready. The meaningless burning of the character’s life continues until he finds Escalibur - an amazing sword stuck in a stone, which only the true heir to the throne can pull out. When the main character touched the sword, the blade of the weapon immediately appeared from stone.
Initially, the boy does not even think of starting to defend his state. An inexperienced ruler is not ready to take responsibility. However, treating the state with indifference, Arthur enters into battle with King Wortigem. This man deceived the throne and came to power. Moreover, he’s the killer of the guy’s parents ...
The life of the protagonist is radically changing. He meets a girl to whom he feels warm feelings and begins to bear responsibility for his native state.
The young man decides to free the country from the merciless Vortigem. It will not be easy to do this, because a man owns black magic, which means that it will be very difficult to resist him. Arthur is not afraid of anything - he is the last hope of the people of his native state.
Interesting Facts
Interesting facts about this movie include the following:
- for the first time on the set, screenwriter Guy Ritchie and popular actor Charlie Hunnam collided;
- locations for filming became Wales, Scotland and England;
- 6 professionals worked on the reproduction of the sword for King Arthur to make him what Guy Ritchie saw him;
- For half a year the film crew was waiting for permission to create a burial mound for the king in the territory of the national park;
- at 6 years old, the main actor first saw the movie "Excalibur";
- the presented film was the 9th in a row with the director Guy Ritchie;
- About 9 different shooting areas were built on the studio grounds. Each of them occupied a vast territory;
- About 10 minutes, a person needs to go around all built sites.
Film work box office
The directors of the project were sure that all the costs that they incurred while making the film would definitely pay off. The works of the fantasy genre always require large investments. The scriptwriters were ready for big waste, did not stint and spent more than $ 150 million. The box office also returned to the creators only 148 million dollars. The filmmakers were disappointed with such results. They were in full confidence that the tape would find its fans and quickly pay off. However, this did not happen. In the early days of box office, a project in the United States raised $ 15.4 million. In other countries, 29.6 million US dollars. Originally planned to create 6 episodes of the film after the failure of the first part were in question.
Opinion of the filmmakers
The filmmakers have a number of reasons why the premiere of the film did not receive a large scale and did not even pay for the directors' expenses. The first reason is the storyline that has bothered the movie fan, the second is the choice of the filing of the film by the scriptwriters, the third is the conflicting trailers, the fourth is the unsuccessful choice of the premiere date, and the fifth is the insufficient number of female characters in the film.
Spectator reviews of the movie "King Arthur's Sword"
Summarizing all the reviews of the audience, we can conclude that the film has both positive and negative sides. Often in reviews of the movie "King Arthur's Sword", viewers note entertainment, amazing computer graphics, an excellent play of actors, expensive scenery, high-quality costumes. Fans of the fantasy genre were pleased with the picture, while more demanding movie fans found a number of shortcomings. These include: the banality of the storyline, a gloomy background, the lack of love lines in the plot, film loops, the lack of thought of the plot, the viewer already knows many characters.
King Arthur's Sword: Criticism
According to film critics, the film was created in compliance with all norms and rules. However, as movie connoisseurs note in their reviews, “King Arthur's Sword” (2017 film) was devoid of action. The film did not have an exciting plot. Also, most of them noted that Richie presented the well-known story in a not so comfortable light. The director tried to combine many genres in his film work, which negatively affected the film. Some events were deleted from the plot, which affected the logic of the storyline. Guy's humor allowed to hide some flaws in the storyline and brighten up moviegoers. Many professional critics were sharply negative towards this director’s creation.